Literature DB >> 11712988

Eye movements and familiarity effects in visual search.

H H Greene1, K Rayner.   

Abstract

Familiarity with the distractors around an unfamiliar target facilitates visual search. Three Experiments examined whether the effect occurs because fixations are (a) shorter and fewer, (b) shorter, but more abundant, (c) equally long, but fewer, or (d) longer, but fewer when distractors are familiar. Results indicated comparably long, but fewer fixations when distractors are familiar. Hence, the theory that unfamiliar distractors need longer processing is discounted. In a fourth Experiment, a gaze-contingent moving window paradigm was used to control peripheral processing. Results revealed a wider span of effective processing for familiar distractors. A hypothesis based on low-level physiological processes is introduced to account for the familiarity effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11712988     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00154-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Eye movements and time-based selection: where do the eyes go in preview search?

Authors:  Derrick G Watson; Matthew Inglis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

2.  Context familiarity enhances target processing by inferior temporal cortex neurons.

Authors:  Ryan E B Mruczek; David L Sheinberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Modelling attention in individual cells leads to a system with realistic saccade behaviours.

Authors:  Linda J Lanyon; Susan L Denham
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2009-01-03       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Directional processing within the perceptual span during visual target localization.

Authors:  Harold H Greene; Alexander Pollatsek; Kathleen Masserang; Yen Ju Lee; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline.

Authors:  Kenneth Holmqvist; Saga Lee Örbom; Ignace T C Hooge; Diederick C Niehorster; Robert G Alexander; Richard Andersson; Jeroen S Benjamins; Pieter Blignaut; Anne-Marie Brouwer; Lewis L Chuang; Kirsten A Dalrymple; Denis Drieghe; Matt J Dunn; Ulrich Ettinger; Susann Fiedler; Tom Foulsham; Jos N van der Geest; Dan Witzner Hansen; Samuel B Hutton; Enkelejda Kasneci; Alan Kingstone; Paul C Knox; Ellen M Kok; Helena Lee; Joy Yeonjoo Lee; Jukka M Leppänen; Stephen Macknik; Päivi Majaranta; Susana Martinez-Conde; Antje Nuthmann; Marcus Nyström; Jacob L Orquin; Jorge Otero-Millan; Soon Young Park; Stanislav Popelka; Frank Proudlock; Frank Renkewitz; Austin Roorda; Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck; Bonita Sharif; Frederick Shic; Mark Shovman; Mervyn G Thomas; Ward Venrooij; Raimondas Zemblys; Roy S Hessels
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-04-06

6.  Dissociable modulation of overt visual attention in valence and arousal revealed by topology of scan path.

Authors:  Jianguang Ni; Huihui Jiang; Yixiang Jin; Nanhui Chen; Jianhong Wang; Zhengbo Wang; Yuejia Luo; Yuanye Ma; Xintian Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Mechanisms underlying sharpening of visual response dynamics with familiarity.

Authors:  Sukbin Lim
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Comparing physiological responses during cognitive tests in virtual environments vs. in identical real-world environments.

Authors:  Saleh Kalantari; James D Rounds; Julia Kan; Vidushi Tripathi; Jesus G Cruz-Garza
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.