Literature DB >> 11711914

The postauricular fascial flap as an adjunct to Mustardé and Furnas type otoplasty.

N Horlock1, A Misra, D T Gault.   

Abstract

Anterior riberation methods of otoplasty have been criticized because of the risk of anterior hematoma that can cause anterior skin necrosis, scarring, and even cartilage destruction caused by infection. As a result, cartilage-sparing otoplasty such as the Mustardé and Furnas types has been increasingly popular. However, postauricular suture extrusion may result, and recurrence rates of up to 25 percent have been recorded. In this study, cartilage-sparing otoplasty is refined by the addition of a postauricular fascial flap to reduce suture extrusion and recurrence rates. Fifty-one patients underwent otoplasty (45 bilateral, six unilateral). This technique involves the elevation of a fascial flap from the postauricular region. A new antihelical fold is then created by Mustardé sutures, and the conchal bowl is rotated by Furnas-type concha-mastoid sutures. The fascial flap is then advanced to cover the sutures with a supplementary vascularized layer to prevent suture extrusion. In addition, the advancement of the flap acts as a postauricular support to prevent recurrence. A natural-looking antihelical fold and helical rim is created by this technique. There were no hematomas. There was recurrence in eight ears (8 percent) in six patients. Two patients requested further surgery. No patients developed suture extrusion or granuloma. This is a simple and intrinsically safe procedure and does not cause irreparable complications such as anterior scarring or skin necrosis. The postauricular fascial flap seems to prevent suture extrusion. It may also help to reduce recurrence rates to acceptable levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11711914     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200111000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  8 in total

1.  Outcomes and Complications of the Mustardé Otoplasty: A "Good-Fast-Cheap" Technique for the Prominent Ear Deformity.

Authors:  Matthew L Boroditsky; Aaron C Van Slyke; Jugpal S Arneja
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-09-24

2.  Using bilaterally fascioperichondrial flaps with a distal and a proximal base combined with conventional otoplasty.

Authors:  Saime Irkoren; Deniz Kucukkaya; Nazan Sivrioglu; Heval Selman Ozkan
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Comparison of the result of consolidative technique otoplasty and incisionless otoplasty in the repairs of prominent ears.

Authors:  Metin Temel; Ş Şamil Kahraman; Özge Berber; Cengiz Çevik; Ertap Akoğlu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Treatment of Prominent Ears with an Implantable Clip System: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Norbert V Kang; Ryan L Kerstein
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 4.283

5.  Comparison of Transcutaneous Fixation-Assisted Method with Classical Needle-Assisted Method in Prominent Ear Surgery.

Authors:  Ilker Uyar; Ersin Aksam; Can Kopal; Emin Kapı
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.326

6.  Complications of auricular correction.

Authors:  Otto Staindl; Vanessa Siedek
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-03-14

7.  Earfold Implantable Clip System for Correction of Prominent Ears: Analysis of Safety in 403 Patients.

Authors:  Norbert V Kang; Nilesh Sojitra; Sinisa Glumicic; Jacobus A Vlok; Greg O'Toole; S Alam Hannan; Walid Sabbagh
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-01-12

Review 8.  Earfold: A New Technique for Correction of the Shape of the Antihelix.

Authors:  Norbert V Kang; Walid Sabbagh; Greg O'Toole; Michael Silberberg
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 3.325

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.