Literature DB >> 11711821

On the assets of CAD planning for craniosynostosis surgery.

M Y Mommaerts1, G Jans, J Vander Sloten, P F Staels, G Van der Perre, R Gobin.   

Abstract

SkullWiz is a computer-aided design program that transforms computer tomographic data of the neurocranium into a mathematical model that can be interactively manipulated to plan craniosynostosis surgery. Proper planning of this type of surgery involves reference to the underlying viscerocranium and to normal neurocranial dimensions, simulation of all basic surgical actions (closed and open osteotomy, translation, rotation, bending, removal, burring), and reference to the mechanical properties of calvarial bone at a given age. With SkullWiz, infinite trials are possible to develop a surgical plan that combines minimal action with maximum morphologic result. In contrast, physical models, e.g., foam milled or stereolitographic, provide just a single (or double, after gluing) opportunity to visualize three-dimensional morphology and simulate a treatment plan, without reference support. Validation of SkullWiz is difficult due to parameter variability. Its assets are therefore graphically exemplified in two common types of nonsyndromatic single-suture craniosynostosis-trigonocephaly and anterior plagiocephaly. SkullWiz is one of the most accurate planning tools currently available for craniosynostosis surgery. Accurate transfer of the planning by aluminium templates results in efficient and precise surgery by avoiding per-operative "chipping and fitting."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11711821     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200111000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  8 in total

1.  Virtual surgical planning in craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  Harvey Chim; Nicholas Wetjen; Samir Mardini
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Use of computer-assisted design and manufacturing to localize dural venous sinuses during reconstructive surgery for craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Rajiv R Iyer; Adela Wu; Alexandra Macmillan; Leila Musavi; Regina Cho; Joseph Lopez; George I Jallo; Amir H Dorafshar; Edward S Ahn
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  An Update on Midface Advancement Using Le Fort II and III Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Youssef Tahiri; Jesse Taylor
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.314

4.  Skeletal Deformity in Patients With Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis: Perceptions of the General Public.

Authors:  Emilie Robertson; Peter Kwan; Gorman Louie; Pierre Boulanger; Daniel Aalto
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-03-25

5.  Computer simulation surgery for mandibular reconstruction using a fibular osteotomy guide.

Authors:  Woo Shik Jeong; Jong Woo Choi; Seung Ho Choi
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2014-09-15

6.  Effectiveness of Automatic Planning of Fronto-orbital Advancement for the Surgical Correction of Metopic Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  David García-Mato; Antonio R Porras; Santiago Ochandiano; Gary F Rogers; Roberto García-Leal; José I Salmerón; Javier Pascau; Marius George Linguraru
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-11-11

7.  Computer-assisted preoperative planning of reduction of and osteosynthesis of scapular fracture: A case report.

Authors:  Roman Madeja; Grzegorz Bajor; Ondrej Klima; Lubor Bialy; Jana Pometlova
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2021-10-25

8.  On-site CAD templates reduce surgery time for complex craniostenosis repair in infants: a new method.

Authors:  Markus Lehner; D Wendling-Keim; M Kunz; S Deininger; S Zundel; A Peraud; G Mast
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 1.475

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.