Literature DB >> 11711818

The timing of physiologic closure of the metopic suture: a review of 159 patients using reconstructed 3D CT scans of the craniofacial region.

H L Vu1, J Panchal, E E Parker, N S Levine, P Francel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the normal physiologic timing of the closure of the metopic suture in non-craniosynostotic patients.
METHODS: This clinical study involved a consecutive series of infants and young children who underwent 3D CT-scan evaluation for deformational plagiocephaly or suspected traumatic head injury. All patients with evidence of craniosynostosis were excluded from the study. Every infant and child referred to our Craniofacial Team for deformational plagiocephaly between 1997 and 2000 (n = 84) received a baseline pre-treatment 3D CT-scan of the head. Our study also included a series of selected pediatric trauma patients (1 to 24 months of age) between 1997 and 2000 (n = 75) who received CT-scan to rule out head injury. The CT scan results were reviewed for closure of metopic suture by a single observer.
RESULTS: The earliest evidence of metopic suture closure was at 3 months, the age at which 33% of patients (4/12) were closed. At 5 months of age, 59% (13/22) of sutures were closed. At 7 months of age, 65% (15/23) were closed. At 9 months of age, 100% (10/10) were closed. All patients greater than 9 months of age within the study had complete metopic suture closure.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that normal or physiologic closure of the metopic suture occurs much earlier than what has been previously described. This study establishes that metopic fusion may normally occur as early as 3 months of age, and that complete fusion occurred by 9 months of age in all patients in our series. Therefore, 3-D CT scans showing complete closure of the metopic suture at an early age (3 to 9 months) cannot be considered as evidence of metopic synostosis, and thus, should not be the decisive factor for early surgical intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11711818     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200111000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  42 in total

1.  Distinguishing Between Lambdoid Craniosynostosis and Deformational Plagiocephaly: A Review of This Paradigm Shift in Clinical Decision-Making and Lesson for the Future.

Authors:  Craig B Birgfeld; Carrie Heike
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-11-18

Review 2.  Neurodevelopmental implications of "deformational" plagiocephaly.

Authors:  Brent Collett; David Breiger; Darcy King; Michael Cunningham; Matthew Speltz
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.225

3.  Small anatomical variant has profound implications for evolution of human birth and brain development.

Authors:  Robert G Tague
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Skeletal survey normal variants, artefacts and commonly misinterpreted findings not to be confused with non-accidental injury.

Authors:  Alan J Quigley; Samuel Stafrace
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-01-07

5.  Physiologic closure time of the metopic suture in South Australian infants from 3D CT scans.

Authors:  Sophie Jane Teager; Sarah Constantine; Nicolene Lottering; Peter John Anderson
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Centile charts for cranial sutures in children younger than 1 year based on ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  Katya Rozovsky; Nicholas James Barrowman; Elka Miller
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-01-06

7.  New high-resolution computed tomography data of the Taung partial cranium and endocast and their bearing on metopism and hominin brain evolution.

Authors:  Ralph L Holloway; Douglas C Broadfield; Kristian J Carlson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Osteoblast differentiation profiles define sex specific gene expression patterns in craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Sarah S Park; Richard P Beyer; Matthew D Smyth; Christine M Clarke; Andrew E Timms; Theo K Bammler; Brendan D Stamper; Brigham H Mecham; Jennifer A Gustafson; Michael L Cunningham
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Modelling human skull growth: a validated computational model.

Authors:  Joseph Libby; Arsalan Marghoub; David Johnson; Roman H Khonsari; Michael J Fagan; Mehran Moazen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 10.  Pathology in metopic synostosis.

Authors:  Pinar Karabagli
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 1.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.