Literature DB >> 30218142

Physiologic closure time of the metopic suture in South Australian infants from 3D CT scans.

Sophie Jane Teager1, Sarah Constantine2, Nicolene Lottering3, Peter John Anderson4,3,5.   

Abstract

Metopic synostosis is a craniofacial condition characterised by the premature fusion of the metopic suture. This early fusion restricts frontal bone growth [17] and has significant impacts on the developing infant during a critical phase of rapid growth and development [4]. Diagnosis of the condition is usually achieved by clinical assessment, followed by a three-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT) scan, verifying premature metopic suture fusion.
PURPOSE: This retrospective study aims to investigate the timing of metopic suture fusion in the developing infant in an Australian subpopulation.
METHODS: The study evaluates metopic suture fusion in 258 cranial 3D CT scans of children aged 0-24 months over a 5-year period (2011-2016), scanned at Women's and Children's Hospital.
RESULTS: The findings suggest that the age range over which physiologic metopic suture fusion occurs is larger than previously reported.
CONCLUSIONS: The approximate range for physiologic fusion was found to be 3-19 months and patients with fusion within this range can be considered normal. Complete suture fusion is expected by 19 months. Additionally, results indicate suture fusion prior to 3 months is abnormal and diagnostically indicative of metopic synostosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Craniosynostosis; Metopic synostosis; Suture biology; Trigonocephaly

Year:  2018        PMID: 30218142     DOI: 10.1007/s00381-018-3957-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst        ISSN: 0256-7040            Impact factor:   1.475


  20 in total

1.  Introducing Computed Tomography Standards for Age Estimation of Modern Australian Subadults Using Postnatal Ossification Timings of Select Cranial and Cervical Sites(.).

Authors:  Nicolene Lottering; Donna M MacGregor; Clair L Alston; Debbie Watson; Laura S Gregory
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.832

2.  The preoperative incidence of raised intracranial pressure in nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis is underestimated in the literature.

Authors:  Steven A Wall; Gregory P L Thomas; David Johnson; Jo C Byren; Jayaratnam Jayamohan; Shailendra A Magdum; David J McAuley; Peter G Richards
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Metopic synostosis: evaluation of aesthetic results.

Authors:  S R Cohen; H Maher; J D Wagner; R C Dauser; M H Newman; K M Muraszko
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 4.  Genetic basis of single-suture synostoses: genes, chromosomes and clinical implications.

Authors:  Wanda Lattanzi; Nenad Bukvic; Marta Barba; Gianpiero Tamburrini; Camilla Bernardini; Fabrizio Michetti; Concezio Di Rocco
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Genetic advances in craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Wanda Lattanzi; Marta Barba; Lorena Di Pietro; Simeon A Boyadjiev
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Metopic synostosis: in favour of a "simplified" surgical treatment.

Authors:  C Di Rocco; F Velardi; A Ferrario; E Marchese
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Metopic synostosis: Defining the temporal sequence of normal suture fusion and differentiating it from synostosis on the basis of computed tomography images.

Authors:  Jeffrey Weinzweig; Richard E Kirschner; Alexander Farley; Philip Reiss; Jill Hunter; Linton A Whitaker; Scott P Bartlett
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Longitudinal assessment of mental development in infants with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis with and without cranial release and reconstruction.

Authors:  K A Kapp-Simon; A Figueroa; C A Jocher; M Schafer
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 9.  Genetic analysis of non-syndromic craniosynostosis.

Authors:  S A Boyadjiev
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 10.  Metopic synostosis.

Authors:  Jacques van der Meulen
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing Teaching in Biomedical, Health and Exercise Science with Real-Time Physiological Visualisations.

Authors:  Christian Moro; Zane Stromberga; Ashleigh Moreland
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Predicting and comparing three corrective techniques for sagittal craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Connor Cross; Roman H Khonsari; Dawid Larysz; David Johnson; Lars Kölby; Mehran Moazen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Contributions of anatomy to forensic sex estimation: focus on head and neck bones.

Authors:  Thamires Mello-Gentil; Vanessa Souza-Mello
Journal:  Forensic Sci Res       Date:  2021-07-01

4.  Impaired wound healing following cranial vault reconstruction in a patient with an atypical phenotype of Marfan syndrome: A case report.

Authors:  Matthew J Recker; Nathaniel Kronenwetter; Renée M Reynolds; Laurie S Sadler; Michael R Markiewicz
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2022-07-29

5.  Incidence of persistent metopic suture in Australia: findings from 1034 three-dimensional computed tomography scans.

Authors:  Sarut Chaisrisawadisuk; Sarah Constantine; Nicolene Lottering; Mark H Moore; Peter J Anderson
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 1.475

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.