Literature DB >> 11710386

Growth of pea epicotyl in low magnetic field: implication for space research.

Y Negishi1, A Hashimoto, M Tsushima, C Dobrota, M Yamashita, T Nakamura.   

Abstract

A magnetic field is an inescapable environmental factor for plants on the earth. However, its impact on plant growth is not well understood. In order to survey how magnetic fields affect plant, Alaska pea seedlings were incubated under low magnetic field (LMF) and also in the normal geo-magnetic environment. Two-day-old etiolated seedlings were incubated in a magnetic shield box and in a control box. Sedimentation of amyloplasts was examined in the epicotyls of seedlings grown under these two conditions. The elongation of epicotyls was promoted by LMF. Elongation was most prominent in the middle part of the epicotyls. Cell elongation and increased osmotic pressure of cell sap were found in the epidermal cells exposed to LMF. When the gravitational environment was 1G, the epicotyls incubated under both LMF and normal geomagnetic field grew straight upward and amyloplasts sedimented similarly. However, under simulated microgravity (clinostat), epicotyl and cell elongation was promoted. Furthermore, the epicotyls bent and amyloplasts were dispersed in the cells in simulated microgravity. The dispersion of amyloplasts may relate to the posture control in epicotyl growth under simulated microgravity generated by 3D clinorotation, since it was not observed under LMF in 1G. Since enhanced elongation of cells was commonly seen both at LMF and in simulated microgravity, all elongation on the 3D-clinostat could result from pseudo-low magnetic field, as a by-product of clinorotation. (i.e., clinostat results could be based on randomization of magnetic field together with randomization of gravity vector.) Our results point to the possible use of space for studies in magnetic biology. With space experiments, the effects of dominant environmental factors, such as gravity on plants, could be neutralized or controlled for to reveal magnetic effects more clearly. c1999 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 11710386     DOI: 10.1016/s0273-1177(99)00342-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Space Res        ISSN: 0273-1177            Impact factor:   2.152


  5 in total

Review 1.  Magnetoreception in plants.

Authors:  Paul Galland; Alexander Pazur
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 2.  How the Geomagnetic Field Influences Life on Earth - An Integrated Approach to Geomagnetobiology.

Authors:  Weronika Erdmann; Hanna Kmita; Jakub Z Kosicki; Łukasz Kaczmarek
Journal:  Orig Life Evol Biosph       Date:  2021-08-07       Impact factor: 1.950

Review 3.  Biological effects of the hypomagnetic field: An analytical review of experiments and theories.

Authors:  Vladimir N Binhi; Frank S Prato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Magnetic field effects on plant growth, development, and evolution.

Authors:  Massimo E Maffei
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Can the tardigrade Hypsibius dujardini survive in the absence of the geomagnetic field?

Authors:  Weronika Erdmann; Bogdan Idzikowski; Wojciech Kowalski; Bogdan Szymański; Jakub Z Kosicki; Łukasz Kaczmarek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.