Documentation of pain assessment and treatment: how are we doing?

The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate documentation of practice provided by a multidisciplinary team of nurses, physicians, and pharmacists who participated in an educational program on postoperative pain management. Chart audit of 787 patient charts at 6 sites revealed documentation of pain histories in approximately 75% of the charts, most often in the surgeon's history and physical examination. Examination of multiple assessment items indicated that the experimental group, relative to the control group, experienced an increase of more than 10% in the documentation of pain intensity, pain quality, pain duration, numeric rating scale used, pain behavior, factors that increase pain, vital signs, sedation level, cognitive status, social interaction, and mood from before the program to 6 months after the program. Across all sites, documentation of assessment, treatment, and treatment outcome data was infrequent and inconsistent. Calculation of documentation of 4 items that constituted a focused assessment of postoperative pain on the surgical floor revealed a significant program effect for assessment of pain quality and pain intensity. A postprogram survey of participants in the educational program revealed an increase in discussion of postoperative pain management with other practitioners and an increase in use of a 0 to 10 scale to rate pain. More documentation of patient pain history, clinical problems, treatment, and follow-up action is needed to improve practice and research.

RCT Entities:   Population Interventions Outcomes