C Glas1, P Hotz, R Steffen. 1. Sozialversicher- ungsanstalt des Kantons Zürich (SVA Zürich), Röngtenstrasse 17, Zürich, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the scientific literature supports the hypothesis that workers exposed to sewage are at higher risk of hepatitis A (HA). METHODS: All original papers reporting epidemiological studies published in English, French, or German which reported on the risk of HA infection in workers exposed to sewage were eligible. They were identified by several methods and each original paper was assessed independently with a checklist by two people. Studies were classified according to the strength of their design. Non-eligible studies were also examined to assess the impact of publication bias. If the risk estimates diverged widely, causes for heterogeneity were assessed. A distinction was made between seroprevalence studies based on subclinical HA (defined only by the presence of anti-HA antibodies) and clinical HA. RESULTS: 17 eligible studies were identified. No indication of an increased risk of clinical HA could be found. For seroprevalence the studies with the strongest design suggested a slightly increased risk of subclinical HA with an odds ratio (OR) <2.5. Heterogeneity was considerable and precluded a meta-analysis. Considering non-eligible studies would still decrease the OR. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic review does not confirm an increased risk of clinical HA in workers exposed to sewage. An increased risk of subclinical HA cannot be excluded but the association between seropositivity and exposure to sewage was not strong and became still weaker if publication bias was taken into account.
OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the scientific literature supports the hypothesis that workers exposed to sewage are at higher risk of hepatitis A (HA). METHODS: All original papers reporting epidemiological studies published in English, French, or German which reported on the risk of HA infection in workers exposed to sewage were eligible. They were identified by several methods and each original paper was assessed independently with a checklist by two people. Studies were classified according to the strength of their design. Non-eligible studies were also examined to assess the impact of publication bias. If the risk estimates diverged widely, causes for heterogeneity were assessed. A distinction was made between seroprevalence studies based on subclinical HA (defined only by the presence of anti-HA antibodies) and clinical HA. RESULTS: 17 eligible studies were identified. No indication of an increased risk of clinical HA could be found. For seroprevalence the studies with the strongest design suggested a slightly increased risk of subclinical HA with an odds ratio (OR) <2.5. Heterogeneity was considerable and precluded a meta-analysis. Considering non-eligible studies would still decrease the OR. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic review does not confirm an increased risk of clinical HA in workers exposed to sewage. An increased risk of subclinical HA cannot be excluded but the association between seropositivity and exposure to sewage was not strong and became still weaker if publication bias was taken into account.
Authors: R Iftimovici; V Iacobescu; Y Copelovici; A Dincă; L Iordan; R Niculescu; L Teleguţă; M Chelaru Journal: Virologie Date: 1980 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 0.474
Authors: Rachel E Rosenberg Goldstein; Shirley A Micallef; Shawn G Gibbs; Ashish George; Emma Claye; Amir Sapkota; Sam W Joseph; Amy R Sapkota Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2013-08-07 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Noele P Nelson; Mark K Weng; Megan G Hofmeister; Kelly L Moore; Mona Doshani; Saleem Kamili; Alaya Koneru; Penina Haber; Liesl Hagan; José R Romero; Sarah Schillie; Aaron M Harris Journal: MMWR Recomm Rep Date: 2020-07-03