Literature DB >> 11704314

Quantitative dose-volume response analysis of changes in parotid gland function after radiotherapy in the head-and-neck region.

J M Roesink1, M A Moerland, J J Battermann, G J Hordijk, C H Terhaard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the radiation tolerance of the parotid glands as a function of dose and volume irradiated. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred eight patients treated with primary or postoperative radiotherapy for various malignancies in the head-and-neck region were prospectively evaluated. Stimulated parotid flow rate was measured before radiotherapy and 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after radiotherapy. Parotid gland dose-volume histograms were derived from CT-based treatment planning. The normal tissue complication probability model proposed by Lyman was fit to the data. A complication was defined as stimulated parotid flow rate <25% of the preradiotherapy flow rate.
RESULTS: The mean stimulated preradiotherapy flow rate of 174 parotid glands was 0.34 mL/min. The mean flow rate reduced to 0.12 mL/min 6 weeks postradiotherapy, but recovered to a mean flow rate of 0.20 mL/min at 1 year after radiotherapy. Reduction in postradiotherapy flow rate correlated significantly with mean parotid dose. No threshold dose was found. Increasing the irradiated volume of parotid glands from 0%-40% to 90-100% in patients with a mean parotid dose of 35-45 Gy resulted in a decrease in flow ratio from, respectively, approximately 100% to less than 10% 6 weeks after radiation. The flow ratio of the 90%-100% group partially recovered to 15% at 6 months and to 30% at 1 year after radiotherapy. The normal tissue complication probability model parameter TD(50) (the dose to the whole organ leading to a complication probability of 50%) was found to be 31, 35, and 39 Gy at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postradiotherapy, respectively. The volume dependency parameter n was around 1, which means that the mean parotid dose correlates best with the observed complications. There was no steep dose-response curve (m = 0.45 at 1 year postradiotherapy).
CONCLUSIONS: This study on dose/volume/parotid gland function relationships revealed a linear correlation between postradiotherapy flow ratio and parotid gland dose and a strong volume dependency. No threshold dose was found. Recovery of parotid gland function was shown at 6 months and 1 year after radiotherapy. In radiation planning, attempts should be made to achieve a mean parotid gland dose at least below 39 Gy (leading to a complication probability of 50%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11704314     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01717-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  49 in total

Review 1.  Radiotherapy dose-volume effects on salivary gland function.

Authors:  Joseph O Deasy; Vitali Moiseenko; Lawrence Marks; K S Clifford Chao; Jiho Nam; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: management strategies and economic impact.

Authors:  S B Jensen; A M L Pedersen; A Vissink; E Andersen; C G Brown; A N Davies; J Dutilh; J S Fulton; L Jankovic; N N F Lopes; A L S Mello; L V Muniz; C A Murdoch-Kinch; R G Nair; J J Napeñas; A Nogueira-Rodrigues; D Saunders; B Stirling; I von Bültzingslöwen; D S Weikel; L S Elting; F K L Spijkervet; M T Brennan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  The impact of dose on parotid salivary recovery in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiation therapy.

Authors:  Yun Li; Jeremy M G Taylor; Randall K Ten Haken; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  Clinical management of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia in head-and-neck cancer patients: successes and barriers.

Authors:  Arjan Vissink; James B Mitchell; Bruce J Baum; Kirsten H Limesand; Siri Beier Jensen; Philip C Fox; Linda S Elting; Johannes A Langendijk; Robert P Coppes; Mary E Reyland
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  On the radiobiological impact of metal artifacts in head-and-neck IMRT in terms of tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).

Authors:  Yusung Kim; Wolfgang A Tomé
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-06-16       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 6.  Clinical application of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  O Ballivy; R Galiana Santamaría; A Lozano Borbalas; F Guedea Edo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 7.  The effect of radiotherapy on dental hard tissue--a systematic review.

Authors:  H F J Lieshout; C P Bots
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Xerostomia Quality of Life Scale (XeQoLS) questionnaire: validation of Italian version in head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Luciana Lastrucci; Silvia Bertocci; Vittorio Bini; Simona Borghesi; Roberta De Majo; Andrea Rampini; Pietro Giovanni Gennari; Paola Pernici
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Evaluation of parotid gland function following intensity modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Seok Ho Lee; Tae Hyun Kim; Joo Young Kim; Sung Yong Park; Hong Ryull Pyo; Kyung Hwan Shin; Dae Yong Kim; Joo Young Kim; Kwan Ho Cho
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2006-04-30       Impact factor: 4.679

10.  Parotid gland function after radiotherapy: the combined michigan and utrecht experience.

Authors:  Tim Dijkema; Cornelis P J Raaijmakers; Randall K Ten Haken; Judith M Roesink; Pètra M Braam; Anette C Houweling; Marinus A Moerland; Avraham Eisbruch; Chris H J Terhaard
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.