Literature DB >> 11703037

Inter- and intraobserver variability of radiographic measurements of knee alignment.

O A Ilahi1, N R Kadakia, M H Huo.   

Abstract

To evaluate the variability of radiographic measurement of knee alignment by different observers, as well as repeated measurements by the same observer, standing anteroposterior radiographs of both knees of 36 patients presenting with knee pain were analyzed. Four physicians independently measured the anatomic tibiofemoral angle of both knees for a total of 72 measurements for each observer. These measurements were then repeated 1 month later in a random and blinded fashion. The same handheld goniometer was used for all measurements. The second measurement was within 3.1 degrees of the first measurement 95% of the time, and within 4 degrees 98% of the time. The maximum difference was 6 degrees. Among all four observers, measurements were within 3.7 degrees of each other 95% of the time with a maximum difference of 6 degrees. In addition to radiographic measurement, one physician also performed clinical measurement of knee alignment on these 36 patients using the same handheld goniometer. The clinical measurement was within 5 degrees of the same clinician's radiographic measurement 95% of the time with a maximum difference of 7 degrees. This variability in measuring radiographic alignment should be considered when making decisions on the need for surgical intervention or when evaluating results of procedures that relate to coronal plane alignment of the knee.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11703037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Knee Surg        ISSN: 0899-7403


  6 in total

1.  Distal radius fractures in older patients: is anatomic reduction necessary?

Authors:  Andrew J Synn; Eric C Makhni; Melvin C Makhni; Tamara D Rozental; Charles S Day
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Aseptic tibial debonding as a cause of early failure in a modern total knee arthroplasty design.

Authors:  Diren Arsoy; Mark W Pagnano; David G Lewallen; Arlen D Hanssen; Rafael J Sierra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Automated Analysis of Alignment in Long-Leg Radiographs by Using a Fully Automated Support System Based on Artificial Intelligence.

Authors:  Justus Schock; Daniel Truhn; Daniel B Abrar; Dorit Merhof; Stefan Conrad; Manuel Post; Felix Mittelstrass; Christiane Kuhl; Sven Nebelung
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-12-23

4.  The Ability to Achieve a Specific Target Angle on Weightbearing Radiographs After Valgus High Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Knee Arthritis Is Not Predictable.

Authors:  G Klaud Miller; Agnes Maddox; Sandra El-Daccache
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-08-07

5.  A Quality of Experience assessment of haptic and augmented reality feedback modalities in a gait analysis system.

Authors:  Thiago Braga Rodrigues; Ciarán Ó Catháin; Noel E O'Connor; Niall Murray
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Geometric semi-automatic analysis of radiographs of Colles' fractures.

Authors:  Constantino Carlos Reyes-Aldasoro; Kwun Ho Ngan; Ananda Ananda; Artur d'Avila Garcez; Andrew Appelboam; Karen M Knapp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.