OBJECTIVE: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has gained widespread acceptance among intensivists as a tool to facilitate decision-making in the management of critically ill patients. This observational study analyzes the indications and impact of TEE and the outcome in patients following cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Standardized reports containing indication, main diagnosis, and impact on patient management were completed during TEE. SETTING: Intensive care unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS: Postoperative cardiac surgery patients requiring TEE. INTERVENTION: TEE in sedated and mechanically ventilated patients. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Reports were obtained in 301 adult patients between June 1996 and June 2000. Indications were postoperative control of left ventricular function in 102 (34%) cases; unexplained, sudden hemodynamic deterioration in 89 (29%); suspicion of pericardial tamponade in 41 (14%); cardiac ischemia in 26 (9%); and "other" in 43 (14%). In 136 patients (45%), a new diagnosis was established or an important pathology was excluded. Pericardial tamponade was diagnosed in 34 cases (11%) and excluded in 36 cases (12%). Other diagnoses included severe left ventricular failure, large pleural effusion, and others. Therapeutic impact was found in 220 cases (73%): change of pharmacologic treatment and/or fluid therapy in 118 cases (40%), resternotomy in 43 (14%), no reoperation necessary in 39 (13%), and various in 20 (7%). No impact was found in 81 cases (27%). In a subgroup of patients in whom preoperative risk scores were evaluated, the indication for a postoperative TEE was significantly associated with a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit: 7 (5.6, 8.4) days vs. 1 (0.8, 1.2) day (median, [95% confidence interval]) (p <.0001), more neurologic complications (18/137 = 13.1% vs. 21/680 = 3.0%) (p <.0001), and increased mortality (34/153 = 22.2% vs. 18/709 = 2.5%) (p <.0001). Corrected for preoperative risk scores, these differences were still significant. CONCLUSION: Although TEE provided important findings and therapeutic impact in postoperative cardiac surgical patients, patients with comparable preoperative risk who had postoperative TEE examinations had a significantly worse outcome than those without the need for postoperative TEE.
OBJECTIVE: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has gained widespread acceptance among intensivists as a tool to facilitate decision-making in the management of critically illpatients. This observational study analyzes the indications and impact of TEE and the outcome in patients following cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Standardized reports containing indication, main diagnosis, and impact on patient management were completed during TEE. SETTING: Intensive care unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS: Postoperative cardiac surgery patients requiring TEE. INTERVENTION: TEE in sedated and mechanically ventilated patients. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Reports were obtained in 301 adult patients between June 1996 and June 2000. Indications were postoperative control of left ventricular function in 102 (34%) cases; unexplained, sudden hemodynamic deterioration in 89 (29%); suspicion of pericardial tamponade in 41 (14%); cardiac ischemia in 26 (9%); and "other" in 43 (14%). In 136 patients (45%), a new diagnosis was established or an important pathology was excluded. Pericardial tamponade was diagnosed in 34 cases (11%) and excluded in 36 cases (12%). Other diagnoses included severe left ventricular failure, large pleural effusion, and others. Therapeutic impact was found in 220 cases (73%): change of pharmacologic treatment and/or fluid therapy in 118 cases (40%), resternotomy in 43 (14%), no reoperation necessary in 39 (13%), and various in 20 (7%). No impact was found in 81 cases (27%). In a subgroup of patients in whom preoperative risk scores were evaluated, the indication for a postoperative TEE was significantly associated with a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit: 7 (5.6, 8.4) days vs. 1 (0.8, 1.2) day (median, [95% confidence interval]) (p <.0001), more neurologic complications (18/137 = 13.1% vs. 21/680 = 3.0%) (p <.0001), and increased mortality (34/153 = 22.2% vs. 18/709 = 2.5%) (p <.0001). Corrected for preoperative risk scores, these differences were still significant. CONCLUSION: Although TEE provided important findings and therapeutic impact in postoperative cardiac surgical patients, patients with comparable preoperative risk who had postoperative TEE examinations had a significantly worse outcome than those without the need for postoperative TEE.
Authors: Matthias S G Goepfert; Daniel A Reuter; Derya Akyol; Peter Lamm; Erich Kilger; Alwin E Goetz Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 17.440