Literature DB >> 11699483

Thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa associated with age.

N Wara-aswapati1, W Pitiphat, N Chandrapho, C Rattanayatikul, N Karimbux.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The palatal masticatory mucosa is widely used as a donor material in periodontal plastic surgery. However, there are relatively few studies investigating the volume or thickness of the palatal mucosa. The purpose of this study was to determine the thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa in Asian subjects aged 14 to 59 years by a direct clinical technique. The associations of age and gender with the thickness of palatal mucosa were also examined.
METHODS: Sixty-two systemically and periodontally healthy Asians (31 males; 31 females; age range 14 to 59 years) participated in this study. The younger age group (age 14 to 21 years) consisted of 32 subjects with a mean age of 16.8 years, whereas the older age group (age 30 to 59 years) consisted of 30 subjects with a mean age of 38.7 years. A bone-sounding method using a periodontal probe with minimal anesthesia and a prepared clear acrylic stent were utilized to assess the thickness of palatal mucosa at 15 measurement sites defined according to the gingival margin and mid-palatal line. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to examine the associations of age and gender with the mean mucosal thickness at the subject level. The Wilcoxon test was used to determine the difference in mucosal thickness between the 2 age groups, and between gender at each measurement point.
RESULTS: The mean thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa ranged from 2.0 to 3.7 mm. The younger age group had significantly thinner mucosa (mean 2.8 +/- 0.3 mm) than the older age group (mean 3.1 +/- 0.3 mm). Females had thinner mucosa than males in the same age group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Overall, the thickness of palatal mucosa increased from the canine to second molar areas and in the sites furthest from the gingival margin towards the mid-palate (with the exception of the first molar area, where significantly decreased thickness was observed).
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limits of the present study, the canine and premolar areas appear to be the most appropriate donor site for grafting procedures in both young and adult individuals. The subepithelial connective tissue graft procedure can be considered as a treatment modality in young patients, since a sufficient volume of donor tissue can be obtained from the hard palate area. Other factors that may influence the thickness of palatal mucosa such as racial and genetic factors and body weight need to be further investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11699483     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.10.1407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  35 in total

1.  Gender, age, vessel size, cup vs. straw sipping, and sequence effects on sip volume.

Authors:  Harry T Lawless; Sharon Bender; Carol Oman; Cathy Pelletier
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Modeling mucosal dimensions after implantation of a bio-absorbable membrane for surgical root coverage.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Müller
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Histological assessment of the palatal mucosa and greater palatine artery with reference to subepithelial connective tissue grafting.

Authors:  Kwang-Hee Cho; Sun-Kyoung Yu; Myoung-Hwa Lee; Dong-Seol Lee; Heung-Joong Kim
Journal:  Anat Cell Biol       Date:  2013-09-30

4.  Determination of the palatal masticatory mucosa thickness by dental MRI: a prospective study analysing age and gender effects.

Authors:  Alexander Heil; Franz Sebastian Schwindling; Constanze Jelinek; Manuel Fischer; Marcel Prager; Eduardo Lazo Gonzalez; Martin Bendszus; Sabine Heiland; Tim Hilgenfeld
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Gingival Biotype Assessment in a Healthy Periodontium: Transgingival Probing Method.

Authors:  R G Shiva Manjunath; Anju Rana; Arijit Sarkar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-05-01

6.  Histomorphometric analysis of the palatal mucosa associated with periodontal plastic surgery on cadavers.

Authors:  Sun-Kyoung Yu; Baek-Hee Lee; Myoung-Hwa Lee; Kwang-Hee Cho; Do Kyung Kim; Heung-Joong Kim
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Evaluation of variation in the palatal gingival biotypes using an ultrasound device.

Authors:  Nami Rajpoot; Aarati Nayak; Ranganath Nayak; Praveen Kumar Bankur
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-03-01

8.  Assessment of thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa and maximum graft dimensions at palatal vault associated with age and gender - a clinical study.

Authors:  Ramesh Ksv; Swetha P; Krishnan V; Mythili R; Rama Krishna Alla; Manikandan D
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-05-15

9.  Surgical management of gingival recession: A clinical update.

Authors:  Hamdan Alghamdi; Nadir Babay; Anil Sukumaran
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2009-08-05

10.  Anatomical study of the greater palatine artery and related structures of the palatal vault: considerations for palate as the subepithelial connective tissue graft donor site.

Authors:  Sebastian Krystian Klosek; Thanaporn Rungruang
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 1.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.