Literature DB >> 11699181

Surface roughness assessment of resin-based materials during brushing preceded by pH-cycling simulations.

C P Turssi1, C S de Magalhães, M C Serra, A L Rodrigues Júnior.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the surface roughness pattern of resin-based restorative materials during brushing preceded by a regimen that simulated a dynamic pH-cycling. Restoratives included two resin composites (Renamel Microfill and Charisma), two polyacid-modified composite resins (Compoglass-F and Dyract AP) and one resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LC Improved). Twenty standardized cylindrical specimens of each material were prepared according to a randomized complete block design. After finishing and polishing, the average surface roughness (Ra) and profile-length ratio (LR) of the specimens were determined. The experimental units were subjected to a pH-cycling regimen, and then to 10,000 brushing strokes. New readings of both the Ra and LR parameters were obtained. The same protocol of pH-cycling, brushing simulation and surface roughness measurements were repeated 10 times. Data was analyzed using ANOVA according to split-plot design and Tukey's test. Results showed the pH-cycling followed by 10,000 brushing strokes provided a remarkable increase in Ra for all restorative materials except for Renamel. Throughout the brushing simulation, Renamel, Charisma, Compoglass-F and Dyract AP showed steady textures, whereas Fuji II LC Improved exhibited a progressive increase in surface roughness. Among the materials tested, Renamel presented the smoothest surface, followed by Charisma and Compoglass-F, which did not differ from each other except at the baseline. Dyract AP was different from both these materials except at the baseline. Fuji II LC Improved had the roughest surface texture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11699181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  8 in total

1.  Study on the potential inhibition of root dentine wear adjacent to fluoride-containing restorations.

Authors:  Cecilia Pedroso Turssi; Anderson Takeo Hara; Silvia Jorge Domiciano; Mônica Campos Serra
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Effect of chemical degradation followed by toothbrushing on the surface roughness of restorative composites.

Authors:  Fernanda Regina Voltarelli; Claudia Batitucci dos Santos-Daroz; Marcelo Corrêa Alves; Andrea Nóbrega Cavalcanti; Giselle Maria Marchi
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Effect of addition of Nano hydroxyapatite particles on wear of resin modified glass ionomer by tooth brushing simulation.

Authors:  Kiana Poorzandpoush; Ladan-Ranjbar Omrani; Shiva H Jafarnia; Parisa Golkar; Mohammad Atai
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-03-01

4.  Effect of Chemical and Mechanical Degradation on Surface Roughness, Topography, Gloss, and Polish Retention of Three Composites Polished with Five Polishing Systems.

Authors:  Fatemeh Farzaneh; Mahshid Mohammadi-Bassir; Mohammad Bagher Rezvani; Fahimeh Dehestani Ardakani
Journal:  Front Dent       Date:  2021-11-01

5.  Impact of filler size and distribution on roughness and wear of composite resin after simulated toothbrushing.

Authors:  Gabriela Ulian de Oliveira; Rafael Francisco Lia Mondelli; Marcela Charantola Rodrigues; Eduardo Batista Franco; Sérgio Kiyoshi Ishikiriama; Linda Wang
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

6.  Change in surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials after exposure to different immersion regimes in a cola drink.

Authors:  Navroop Kaur Bajwa; Anuradha Pathak
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2014-03-23

Review 7.  Ageing of Dental Composites Based on Methacrylate Resins-A Critical Review of the Causes and Method of Assessment.

Authors:  Agata Szczesio-Wlodarczyk; Jerzy Sokolowski; Joanna Kleczewska; Kinga Bociong
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 4.329

8.  Chemical composition and roughness of enamel and composite after bleaching, acidic beverages and toothbrushing.

Authors:  Marília-de-Morais Pinelli; Anderson Catelan; Luís-Felipe-Marques de Resende; Luís-Eduardo-Silva Soares; Flávio-Henrique-Baggio Aguiar; Priscila-Christiane-Suzy Liporoni
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-12-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.