Literature DB >> 10858336

Role of antibiotic penetration limitation in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm resistance to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin.

J N Anderl1, M J Franklin, P S Stewart.   

Abstract

The penetration of two antibiotics, ampicillin and ciprofloxacin, through biofilms developed in an in vitro model system was investigated. The susceptibilities of biofilms and corresponding freely suspended bacteria to killing by the antibiotics were also measured. Biofilms of Klebsiella pneumoniae were developed on microporous membranes resting on agar nutrient medium. The susceptibilities of planktonic cultures and biofilms to 10 times the MIC were determined. Antibiotic penetration through biofilms was measured by assaying the concentration of antibiotic that diffused through the biofilm to an overlying filter disk. Parallel experiments were performed with a mutant K. pneumoniae strain in which beta-lactamase activity was eliminated. For wild-type K. pneumoniae grown in suspension culture, ampicillin and ciprofloxacin MICs were 500 and 0.18 microgram/ml, respectively. The log reductions in the number of CFU of planktonic wild-type bacteria after 4 h of treatment at 10 times the MIC were 4.43 +/- 0.33 and 4.14 +/- 0.33 for ampicillin and ciprofloxacin, respectively. Biofilms of the same strain were much less susceptible, yielding log reductions in the number of CFU of -0.06 +/- 0.06 and 1.02 +/- 0.04 for ampicillin and ciprofloxacin, respectively, for the same treatment. The number of CFU in the biofilms after 24 h of antibiotic exposure was not statistically different from the number after 4 h of treatment. Ampicillin did not penetrate wild-type K. pneumoniae biofilms, whereas ciprofloxacin and a nonreactive tracer (chloride ion) penetrated the biofilms quickly. The concentration of ciprofloxacin reached the MIC throughout the biofilm within 20 min. Ampicillin penetrated biofilms formed by a beta-lactamase-deficient mutant. However, the biofilms formed by this mutant were resistant to ampicillin treatment, exhibiting a 0.18 +/- 0.07 log reduction in the number of CFU after 4 h of exposure and a 1.64 +/- 0.33 log reduction in the number of CFU after 24 h of exposure. Poor penetration contributed to wild-type biofilm resistance to ampicillin but not to ciprofloxacin. The increased resistance of the wild-type strain to ciprofloxacin and the mutant strain to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin could not be accounted for by antibiotic inactivation or slow diffusion since these antibiotics fully penetrated the biofilms. These results suggest that some other resistance mechanism is involved for both agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10858336      PMCID: PMC89967          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.44.7.1818-1824.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  42 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.

Authors:  J W Costerton; P S Stewart; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Influence of growth rate on susceptibility to antimicrobial agents: biofilms, cell cycle, dormancy, and stringent response.

Authors:  P Gilbert; P J Collier; M R Brown
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from cerebrospinal fluid shunts: importance of slime production, species identification, and shunt removal to clinical outcome.

Authors:  J J Younger; G D Christensen; D L Bartley; J C Simmons; F F Barrett
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  In vivo verification of in vitro model of antibiotic treatment of device-related infection.

Authors:  J Blaser; P Vergères; A F Widmer; W Zimmerli
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Investigation of ciprofloxacin penetration into Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  P A Suci; M W Mittelman; F P Yu; G G Geesey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Biofilm accumulation model that predicts antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  P S Stewart
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Growth-rate-independent killing by ciprofloxacin of biofilm-derived Staphylococcus epidermidis; evidence for cell-cycle dependency.

Authors:  I G Duguid; E Evans; M R Brown; P Gilbert
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Direct measurement of chlorine penetration into biofilms during disinfection.

Authors:  D De Beer; R Srinivasan; P S Stewart
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  A sandwich cup method for the penetration assay of antimicrobial agents through Pseudomonas exopolysaccharides.

Authors:  H Kumon; K Tomochika; T Matunaga; M Ogawa; H Ohmori
Journal:  Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.955

10.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm as a diffusion barrier to piperacillin.

Authors:  B D Hoyle; J Alcantara; J W Costerton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  245 in total

Review 1.  Riddle of biofilm resistance.

Authors:  K Lewis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Heavy metal resistance of biofilm and planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Gail M Teitzel; Matthew R Parsek
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Transmission electron microscopic study of antibiotic action on Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm.

Authors:  Jeff Zahller; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  The MerR-like transcriptional regulator BrlR contributes to Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm tolerance.

Authors:  Julie Liao; Karin Sauer
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Delayed wound healing in diabetic (db/db) mice with Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm challenge: a model for the study of chronic wounds.

Authors:  Ge Zhao; Phillip C Hochwalt; Marcia L Usui; Robert A Underwood; Pradeep K Singh; Garth A James; Philip S Stewart; Philip Fleckman; John E Olerud
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 3.617

6.  Specialized persister cells and the mechanism of multidrug tolerance in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Iris Keren; Devang Shah; Amy Spoering; Niilo Kaldalu; Kim Lewis
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Transcriptional Regulation of icaADBC by both IcaR and TcaR in Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  Tra-My Hoang; C Zhou; J K Lindgren; M R Galac; B Corey; J E Endres; M E Olson; P D Fey
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Tetracycline rapidly reaches all the constituent cells of uropathogenic Escherichia coli biofilms.

Authors:  G Stone; P Wood; L Dixon; M Keyhan; A Matin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in disease.

Authors:  Lawrence R Mulcahy; Vincent M Isabella; Kim Lewis
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 4.552

10.  SPLUNC1/BPIFA1 contributes to pulmonary host defense against Klebsiella pneumoniae respiratory infection.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Jennifer A Bartlett; Marissa E Di; Jennifer M Bomberger; Yvonne R Chan; Lokesh Gakhar; Rama K Mallampalli; Paul B McCray; Y Peter Di
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.