Literature DB >> 11693900

Factors predictive of outcome in patients with breast cancer refractory to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

T A Buchholz1, B S Hill, S L Tucker, D K Frye, H M Kuerer, A U Buzdar, M D McNeese, S E Singletary, N T Ueno, L Pusztai, V Valero, G N Hortobagyi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical, pathological, and treatment factors that are predictive of local-regional recurrence and overall survival for patients with breast cancer that is refractory to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study analyzed the data of the 177 breast cancer patients treated on our institutional protocols who had less than a partial response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The initial clinical stage of disease was II in 27%, III in 69%, and IV (supraclavicular lymph node involvement) in 4%. Surgery was performed in 94% of the patients, and 77% of these patients also received adjuvant chemotherapy.
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 5.2 years, 106 patients experienced disease recurrence, with 98 of these having distant metastases and 45 having local-regional recurrence. The 5- and 10-year overall survivals for the entire group were 56% and 33%, respectively. The factors that were independently associated with a statistically significant poorer overall survival in a Cox regression analysis were pathologically involved lymph nodes after surgery, estrogen receptor-negative disease, and progressive disease during neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The 5-year overall survival for patients with pathologically negative lymph nodes ranged from 84% (estrogen receptor-positive disease) to 75% (estrogen re-ceptor-negative disease), compared with rates for patients with pathologically positive lymph nodes of 66% (estrogen receptor-positive disease) and 40% (estrogen receptor-negative disease). The 5-year survival of patients with progressive disease was only 19%. The 5- and 10-year local-regional recurrence rates for the 177 patients were 27% and 34%, respectively. Significant factors on Cox analysis that predicted for local-regional recurrence were four or more pathologically involved lymph nodes and estrogen receptor-negative disease. For the 105 patients treated with surgery and postoperative radiation therapy, the 10-year local-regional recurrence rates for the subgroups with 0, 1, or 2 of these factors were 12%, 25%, and 44%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with a poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, conventional treatments achieve reasonable outcomes in those with lymph node-negative disease or estrogen receptor-positive disease. However, more active systemic and local therapies are needed for patients with estrogen receptor-negative disease and positive lymph nodes and for those with clinical evidence of progressive disease during neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11693900

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer J        ISSN: 1528-9117            Impact factor:   3.360


  12 in total

Review 1.  In vivo 1H MRS in the assessment of the therapeutic response of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Uma Sharma; Hyeon Man Baek; Min Ying Su; Naranamangalam R Jagannathan
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 2.  Therapies for triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Eleni Andreopoulou; Sarah J Schweber; Joseph A Sparano; Hayley M McDaid
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.889

3.  Breast cancer local recurrence under the form of inflammatory carcinoma, treated with concurrent radiation and chemotherapy, a case report.

Authors:  Isabel Reis; Helena Pereira; Isabel Azevedo; João Conde; Isabel Bravo; Rogéria Craveiro; Deolinda Pereira
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2013-10-20

Review 4.  Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in primary breast cancer: indications and use as a research tool.

Authors:  Y H Chia; M J Ellis; C X Ma
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Voxel-by-voxel functional diffusion mapping for early evaluation of breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Bing Ma; Charles R Meyer; Martin D Pickles; Thomas L Chenevert; Peyton H Bland; Craig J Galbán; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Lindsay W Turnbull; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Inf Process Med Imaging       Date:  2009

6.  Prediction of pathological complete response of breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: usefulness of breast MRI computer-aided detection.

Authors:  H Kim; H H Kim; J S Park; H J Shin; J H Cha; E Y Chae; W J Choi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  ASO Author Reflections: Heroic Mastectomy for Chemoresistant Disease: A Complex Decision.

Authors:  Anita Mamtani; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Computer-aided evaluation of breast MRI for the residual tumor extent and response monitoring in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Chae Yeon Lyou; Nariya Cho; Sun Mi Kim; Mijung Jang; Jeong-Seon Park; Seung Yon Baek; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Local Recurrence is Frequent After Heroic Mastectomy for Classically Inoperable Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Anita Mamtani; Varadan Sevilimedu; Alain Vincent; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.339

10.  State of the art of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: rationale, results and recent developments.

Authors:  Arnd Honig; Lorenz Rieger; Marc Sutterlin; Diethelm Wallwiener; Johannes Dietl; Erich-Franz Solomayer
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2005-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.