BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the influence of the number of fractions (or the dose per fraction) on the proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intestinal crypt regeneration in mice was used as the biological endpoint. RBE was determined relative to cobalt-60 gamma rays for irradiations in one, three and ten fractions separated by a time interval of 3.5h. Proton irradiations were performed at the middle of a 7-cm Spread Out Bragg Peak (SOBP). RESULTS: Proton RBEs (and corresponding gamma dose per fraction) at the level of 20 regenerated crypts per circumference were found equal to 1.15+/-0.04 (10.0 Gy), 1.15+/-0.05 (4.8 Gy) and 1.14+/-0.07 (1.7 Gy) for irradiations in one, three and ten fractions, respectively. Alpha/beta ratios as derived from direct analysis of the 'quantal radiation response data' were found to be 7.6 Gy for gamma rays and 8.2 Gy for protons. Additional proton irradiations in ten fractions at the end of the SOBP were found to be more effective than at the middle of the SOBP by a factor of 1.14 (1.05-1.23). CONCLUSION: Proton RBE for crypt regeneration was found to be independent of fractionation up to ten fractions. One can expect that it remains unchanged for higher number of fractions as the lethalities for doses smaller than 3 Gy are exclusively due to direct lethal events. As a tendency for increased effectiveness at the end of the SOBP is reported in the majority of the studies, for clinical applications it would be advisable to allow for by arranging a sloping depth dose curve in the deeper part of the target volume. Finally, it must be noticed that most of in vitro and in vivo RBE values for protons are larger than the current clinical RBE (RBE=1.10).
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the influence of the number of fractions (or the dose per fraction) on the proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intestinal crypt regeneration in mice was used as the biological endpoint. RBE was determined relative to cobalt-60 gamma rays for irradiations in one, three and ten fractions separated by a time interval of 3.5h. Proton irradiations were performed at the middle of a 7-cm Spread Out Bragg Peak (SOBP). RESULTS: Proton RBEs (and corresponding gamma dose per fraction) at the level of 20 regenerated crypts per circumference were found equal to 1.15+/-0.04 (10.0 Gy), 1.15+/-0.05 (4.8 Gy) and 1.14+/-0.07 (1.7 Gy) for irradiations in one, three and ten fractions, respectively. Alpha/beta ratios as derived from direct analysis of the 'quantal radiation response data' were found to be 7.6 Gy for gamma rays and 8.2 Gy for protons. Additional proton irradiations in ten fractions at the end of the SOBP were found to be more effective than at the middle of the SOBP by a factor of 1.14 (1.05-1.23). CONCLUSION: Proton RBE for crypt regeneration was found to be independent of fractionation up to ten fractions. One can expect that it remains unchanged for higher number of fractions as the lethalities for doses smaller than 3 Gy are exclusively due to direct lethal events. As a tendency for increased effectiveness at the end of the SOBP is reported in the majority of the studies, for clinical applications it would be advisable to allow for by arranging a sloping depth dose curve in the deeper part of the target volume. Finally, it must be noticed that most of in vitro and in vivo RBE values for protons are larger than the current clinical RBE (RBE=1.10).
Authors: Christoph Greubel; Walter Assmann; Christian Burgdorf; Günther Dollinger; Guanghua Du; Volker Hable; Alexander Hapfelmeier; Ralf Hertenberger; Peter Kneschaurek; Dörte Michalski; Michael Molls; Sabine Reinhardt; Barbara Röper; Stefan Schell; Thomas E Schmid; Christian Siebenwirth; Tatiana Wenzl; Olga Zlobinskaya; Jan J Wilkens Journal: Radiat Environ Biophys Date: 2011-05-10 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Irene Maier; Jared Liu; Paul M Ruegger; Julia Deutschmann; Janina M Patsch; Thomas H Helbich; James Borneman; Robert H Schiestl Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Chris O Wambi; Jenine K Sanzari; Carly M Sayers; Manunya Nuth; Zhaozong Zhou; James Davis; Niklas Finnberg; Joan S Lewis-Wambi; Jeffrey H Ware; Wafik S El-Deiry; Ann R Kennedy Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Jeffrey C Buchsbaum; Mark W McDonald; Peter A S Johnstone; Ted Hoene; Marc Mendonca; Chee-Wei Cheng; Indra J Das; Kevin P McMullen; Mark R Wolanski Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Thomas I Marshall; Pankaj Chaudhary; Anna Michaelidesová; Jana Vachelová; Marie Davídková; Vladimir Vondráček; Giuseppe Schettino; Kevin M Prise Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-02-13 Impact factor: 7.038