Literature DB >> 11689767

The use of respiratory variations in right atrial pressure to predict the cardiac output response to PEEP.

S Magder1, D Lagonidis, F Erice.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the pattern of respiratory variation in right atrial pressure (Pra) predicts the cardiac output response to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 18 patients with a variety of cardiac and pulmonary disorders requiring ventilatory support. A pulmonary artery flotation catheter was in place as part of their routine management. Changes in PEEP were made from 0 to 14 cm H2O to determine the level of PEEP, which increased PO(2) without decreasing cardiac output (ie, assessment of best PEEP). Static lung compliance and auto-PEEP were obtained from the pressure signal on the ventilator. The change in Pra with a spontaneous inspiratory effort (ie, triggered breath) was used to determine whether patients had a restrictive (ie, operating on the flat part of the Starling curve), or nonrestrictive pattern (acting on the ascending part of the Starling curve) as previously described.
RESULTS: Cardiac output decreased 0.7 +/- 0.8 L/min (change from baseline P <.05) in the group with an inspiratory decrease in Pra and -0.04 +/- 1.50 L/min (P = NS) in the group without an inspiratory decrease in Pra. The groups were not significantly different. However, the variance in cardiac output was large and, in contrast to our hypothesis, two patients in the group with an inspiratory decrease in Pra did not have a decrease in cardiac output. Pra and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure after the PEEP trial were greater than before, indicating that reflex circulatory adjustments occurred in response to the PEEP.
CONCLUSIONS: The inspiratory pattern in Pra does not predict the response to cardiac output to PEEP in individual patients. This is most likely because of reflex adaptations in the circuit that occur with the application of PEEP. The response of a patient to PEEP is affected by the patient's volume reserves, filling status of the right atrium, and neurosympathetic activity. Copyright 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11689767     DOI: 10.1053/jcrc.2001.28194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  10 in total

1.  Using ventilation-induced aortic pressure and flow variation to diagnose preload responsiveness.

Authors:  Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-03-06       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Methods of monitoring shock.

Authors:  Ednan K Bajwa; Atul Malhotra; B Taylor Thompson
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.119

3.  Is brachial artery peak velocity variation ready for prime time?

Authors:  Matthias Eikermann; Sheldon Magder; Atul Malhotra
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Evaluation of mean systemic filling pressure from pulse contour cardiac output and central venous pressure.

Authors:  Jacinta J Maas; Bart F Geerts; Jos R C Jansen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Positive end-expiratory pressure-induced increase in external jugular venous pressure does not predict fluid responsiveness in laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Min Hur; Seokha Yoo; Jung-Yoon Choi; Sun-Kyung Park; Dhong Eun Jung; Won Ho Kim; Jin-Tae Kim; Jae-Hyon Bahk
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Appreciating the strengths and weaknesses of transthoracic echocardiography in hemodynamic assessments.

Authors:  Stephen J Huang; Anthony S McLean
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 1.866

Review 7.  Predicting volume responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients: still a challenging problem.

Authors:  S Magder
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  How can the response to volume expansion in patients with spontaneous respiratory movements be predicted?

Authors:  Sarah Heenen; Daniel De Backer; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

Authors:  Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Massimo Antonelli; Richard Beale; Jan Bakker; Christoph Hofer; Roman Jaeschke; Alexandre Mebazaa; Michael R Pinsky; Jean Louis Teboul; Jean Louis Vincent; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  Bench-to-bedside review: An approach to hemodynamic monitoring--Guyton at the bedside.

Authors:  Sheldon Magder
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 9.097

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.