Literature DB >> 11689296

The effects of manipulations of attentional demand on cortical acetylcholine release.

A M Himmelheber1, M Sarter, J P Bruno.   

Abstract

In vivo microdialysis was used to measure acetylcholine (ACh) efflux in the frontoparietal cortex while rats performed in one of two operant tasks. One task was designed and validated to generate measures of sustained attention, while the other task was designed to minimize explicit demands on sustained attentional resources (low-demand task). Transferring animals from the baseline environment into the operant chambers robustly increased cortical ACh efflux regardless of subsequent task demands. Performance in the sustained attention task further increased frontoparietal ACh efflux, and these increases were not observed when animals were simply exposed to the operant chamber without task performance. Manipulations of the task parameters within a session, to either increase or decrease explicit demands on sustained attention, were not associated with fluctuations in ACh efflux. Unexpectedly, performance in the low-demand task was also associated with significant increases in ACh efflux that were similar to those observed during the sustained attention task. However, widespread depletions of cortical cholinergic inputs produced by intra-basalis infusions of 192 IgG-saporin failed to impair performance in the low-demand task, suggesting that cholinergic transmission is not necessary for performance in this task. The present results indicate that although a wider range of instrumental processes than previously hypothesized are associated with increases in cortical ACh release, the dependence of performance on the integrity of cortical cholinergic inputs may be limited to tasks with explicit attentional demands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11689296     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(01)00064-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  21 in total

1.  Differential acetylcholine release in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus during pavlovian trace and delay conditioning.

Authors:  M Melissa Flesher; Allen E Butt; Brandee L Kinney-Hurd
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 2.  CNTRICS final animal model task selection: control of attention.

Authors:  C Lustig; R Kozak; M Sarter; J W Young; T W Robbins
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Neuronal correlates of signal detection in the posterior parietal cortex of rats performing a sustained attention task.

Authors:  J Broussard; M Sarter; B Givens
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Dissociation of attention in learning and action: effects of lesions of the amygdala central nucleus, medial prefrontal cortex, and posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  Jean-Marie Maddux; Erin C Kerfoot; Souvik Chatterjee; Peter C Holland
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 5.  Neuromodulation by glutamate and acetylcholine can change circuit dynamics by regulating the relative influence of afferent input and excitatory feedback.

Authors:  Lisa M Giocomo; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 6.  Cholinergic modulation of cognition: insights from human pharmacological functional neuroimaging.

Authors:  Paul Bentley; Jon Driver; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 11.685

7.  Unique contributions of distinct cholinergic projections to motor cortical plasticity and learning.

Authors:  J M Conner; M Kulczycki; M H Tuszynski
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  The prominent role of stimulus processing: cholinergic function and dysfunction in cognition.

Authors:  Maura L Furey
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 9.  The Insula and Taste Learning.

Authors:  Adonis Yiannakas; Kobi Rosenblum
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 5.639

10.  Amygdala response to explicit sad face stimuli at baseline predicts antidepressant treatment response to scopolamine in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Joanna Szczepanik; Allison C Nugent; Wayne C Drevets; Ashish Khanna; Carlos A Zarate; Maura L Furey
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.376

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.