C Mottur-Pilson1, V Snow, K Bartlett. 1. American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, Department of Scientific Policy, Philadelphia, Penn., USA. cmotturpilson@mail.acponline.org
Abstract
CONTEXT: Substantial effort has been devoted to improving physician compliance with evidence-based guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To explore physicians' reasons for not following so-called "best practices" in caring for patients with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: Descriptive study of self-assessed compliance with five measures of performance. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-five internists who volunteered to participate in a practice-based research network created to improve clinical practice. DATA COLLECTION: Physicians reviewed their own charts of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (1755 patient encounters) to assess compliance and offered open-ended comments concerning their reasons for not complying with "best practices." RESULTS: The physician volunteers reported not complying with the annual foot examination in 13% of encounters. A similar level of noncompliance was reported for the annual lipid profile (15%) and retinal examination (17%). Among the five measures examined, noncompliance was most common for screening urinalysis (26%) and screening microalbuminuria (46%). The physicians' open-ended comments suggested that physician oversight, patient nonadherence, and systems issues were common reasons for noncompliance. However, noncompliance also resulted from a conscious decision by the physician, as indicated by comments about patient age and comorbid illness or, with nephropathy screening, established renal disease or current therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Even among a self-selected group of physicians, noncompliance with best practices in diabetes is common. Although physician forgetfulness and external factors are frequently offered as reasons for noncompliance, it may also result from a conscious decision, as physicians may disagree about what constitutes "best practices."
CONTEXT: Substantial effort has been devoted to improving physician compliance with evidence-based guidelines. OBJECTIVE: To explore physicians' reasons for not following so-called "best practices" in caring for patients with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: Descriptive study of self-assessed compliance with five measures of performance. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-five internists who volunteered to participate in a practice-based research network created to improve clinical practice. DATA COLLECTION: Physicians reviewed their own charts of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (1755 patient encounters) to assess compliance and offered open-ended comments concerning their reasons for not complying with "best practices." RESULTS: The physician volunteers reported not complying with the annual foot examination in 13% of encounters. A similar level of noncompliance was reported for the annual lipid profile (15%) and retinal examination (17%). Among the five measures examined, noncompliance was most common for screening urinalysis (26%) and screening microalbuminuria (46%). The physicians' open-ended comments suggested that physician oversight, patient nonadherence, and systems issues were common reasons for noncompliance. However, noncompliance also resulted from a conscious decision by the physician, as indicated by comments about patient age and comorbid illness or, with nephropathy screening, established renal disease or current therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Even among a self-selected group of physicians, noncompliance with best practices in diabetes is common. Although physician forgetfulness and external factors are frequently offered as reasons for noncompliance, it may also result from a conscious decision, as physicians may disagree about what constitutes "best practices."
Authors: Teryl K Nuckols; Yee-Wei Lim; Barbara O Wynn; Soeren Mattke; Catherine H MacLean; Philip Harber; Robert H Brook; Peggy Wallace; Rena H Garland; Steven Asch Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-11-21 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Andrew J Karter; Howard H Moffet; Jennifer Liu; Melissa M Parker; Ameena T Ahmed; Assiamira Ferrara; Joe V Selby Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: William Dale; Joshua Hemmerich; Elizabeth Moliski; Margaret L Schwarze; Avery Tung Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-09-27 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Andrew L Sussman; Robert L Williams; Robert Leverence; Park W Gloyd; Benjamin F Crabtree Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2006 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: N D Lin; S B Martins; A S Chan; R W Coleman; H B Bosworth; E Z Oddone; R D Shankar; M A Musen; B B Hoffman; M K Goldstein Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2006
Authors: Judith M E Walsh; Vandana Sundaram; Kathryn McDonald; Douglas K Owens; Mary Kane Goldstein Journal: J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 3.738