Literature DB >> 17523727

Quality of care and attributable healthcare costs in diabetic hypertensive patients initiated on calcium antagonist therapy.

John J Barron1, Ibrahim Al-Zakwani, Thomas Iarocci.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Calcium antagonists (CAs) from two classes - dihydropyridine and non-dihydropyridine (DCAs and NDCAs, respectively) - are important add-on agents in goal blood pressure (BP) attainment. This study compared drug regimens to which DCAs or NDCAs had been added; for each class, BP reduction and healthcare costs were evaluated in a diabetic hypertensive population. DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: This was a retrospective observational study using administrative claims data within two US health plans. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension initiated on CA therapy between 1 January 2000 through 30 June 2002 were identified; the date the first CA prescription (CA-Rx) was filled in this period was labelled the index date. Inclusion required plan enrolment for 6 months pre- and 1 year post-index, no CA-Rx 6 months pre-index, and medication possession ratio >50% for 1 year post-index. Patients fell into either dihydropyridine or non-dihydropyridine study groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND
RESULTS: For each group, costs (amounts allowed by plans, in US dollars; actual costs for 2000-2002) were calculated for resources attributable to DM/hypertension. A total of 5551 patients met eligibility criteria (NDCA = 1515; DCA = 4036). Most had been taking other antihypertensive medications: 86% and 76% in the DCA and NDCA groups, respectively. The NDCA group had lower annual attributable costs than the DCA group ($US1637 [95% CI $US1479, $US1813] vs $US1989 [95% CI $US1823, $US2170]; p < 0.004). A total of 313 medical charts were reviewed (DCA = 242, NDCA = 71). Both groups had similar pre-and post-index BP values; mean changes in systolic and diastolic BP were not statistically significant between groups. Only 22% of all patients attained the recommended systolic/diastolic BP goal of <130/80mm Hg, and <45% of patients were tested for proteinuria during the study period.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients initiated on an NDCA attained similar BP reductions compared with DCA at lower total healthcare costs. Opportunities exist for more aggressive management of BP and testing for proteinuria in DM patients with hypertension.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 17523727     DOI: 10.2165/00044011-200424110-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Drug Investig        ISSN: 1173-2563            Impact factor:   2.859


  30 in total

1.  Nephropathy in diabetes.

Authors:  Mark E Molitch; Ralph A DeFronzo; Marion J Franz; William F Keane; Carl Erik Mogensen; Hans-Henrik Parving; Michael W Steffes
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  Design and baseline characteristics of participants in the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK) Pilot Study.

Authors:  J T Wright; J W Kusek; R D Toto; J Y Lee; L Y Agodoa; K A Kirk; O S Randall; R Glassock
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1996-08

3.  Screening and treatment of diabetic nephropathy by primary care physicians.

Authors:  S K Kraft; E N Lazaridis; C Qiu; C M Clark; D G Marrero
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Amlodipine/benazepril: fixed dose combination therapy for hypertension.

Authors:  M A Faulkner; D E Hilleman
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.889

5.  ACE inhibition is effective and renoprotective in hypertensive nephrosclerosis: the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension (AASK) trial.

Authors:  Janice G Douglas; Lawrence Agodoa
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 10.545

6.  Poor control of risk factors for vascular disease among adults with previously diagnosed diabetes.

Authors:  Sharon H Saydah; Judith Fradkin; Catherine C Cowie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Blood pressure control, proteinuria, and the progression of renal disease. The Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study.

Authors:  J C Peterson; S Adler; J M Burkart; T Greene; L A Hebert; L G Hunsicker; A J King; S Klahr; S G Massry; J L Seifter
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-11-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  What have we learned from the current trials?

Authors:  Kevin C Abbott; George L Bakris
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.456

9.  Effects of an ACE inhibitor/calcium antagonist combination on proteinuria in diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  G L Bakris; M R Weir; V DeQuattro; F G McMahon
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Differential effects of antihypertensive agents on electrocardiographic voltage: results from the Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in Diabetes (ABCD) trial.

Authors:  Edward P Havranek; Anne Esler; Raymond O Estacio; Philip S Mehler; Robert W Schrier
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.