Literature DB >> 11685624

Correction of skull defects using hydroxyapatite cement (HAC)--evidence derived from animal experiments and clinical experience.

R Verheggen1, H A Merten.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The development of satisfactory cranioplasty material and technique has been a continuing bio-engineering challenge. Cranial defects resulting from trauma, tumour or infection are most frequently reconstructed with nonviable alloplastic materials. At present, all synthetic or biological materials in the use for human cranioplasty are more or less ideal.
METHODS: The in vivo properties of a fully resorbable bony substitute--hydroxyapatite cement (HAC, BoneSource) are described in clinical investigations and animal experiments. HAC is prepared from calcium phosphate precursors which are hydrated and harden endothermically at 37 degrees C to form hydroxyapatite. Bone formation and resorption characteristics of HAC are examined in an adult minipig cranial defect model.
FINDINGS: Cranial bone integrity has been restored in ten of eleven patients. Radiographic examination 6 months after surgery reveal a successful reconstruction of the skull defects. Sections of the cranial defect site from animals sacrificed at 12, 18 and 40 weeks demonstrate that new bone formation proceeds in HAC filled osseous defects. Histomorphological evaluation of HAC resorption and new bone formation indicates that HAC is nearly completely resorbed within 40 weeks and replaced by new bone with no loss in size or volume.
INTERPRETATION: Hydroxyapatite cement (HAC) has an excellent biocompatibility (non-immunogenic and non-toxic), seems to be an optimal implant for cranial reconstruction and provides a biological scaffold for bone formation. However, further studies need to be conducted to determine the long-term stability of HAC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11685624     DOI: 10.1007/s007010170022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  11 in total

1.  [Influence of different mixing fluids on mechanical and micromorphological in vitro qualities of hydroxyapatite cement].

Authors:  A Nitsch; A Patyk; P Schwartz; H-A Merten
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2005-03

Review 2.  A review of reconstructive materials for use in craniofacial surgery bone fixation materials, bone substitutes, and distractors.

Authors:  James Tait Goodrich; Adam L Sandler; Oren Tepper
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

3.  Clinical experience of the brushite calcium phosphate cement for the repair and augmentation of surgically induced cranial defects following the pterional craniotomy.

Authors:  Cheol Ji; Jae-Geun Ahn
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-03-31

4.  Bone regeneration with glass ceramic implants and calcium phosphate cements in a rabbit cranial defect model.

Authors:  Gerlind Schneider; Karin Blechschmidt; Dirk Linde; Peter Litschko; Thomas Körbs; Eggert Beleites
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  [Rapid setting calcium phosphate cement for craniomaxillofacial surgery. 6 years experience].

Authors:  J-U Piesold; M Merwald; K Braxein; H Pistner
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2003-12-06

6.  Frontal bone remodeling for gender reassignment of the male forehead: a gender-reassignment surgery.

Authors:  Johannes Franz Hoenig
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 2.326

7.  Preparation of Porous Chitosan-Siloxane Hybrids Coated with Hydroxyapatite Particles.

Authors:  Yuki Shirosaki; Kohei Okamoto; Satoshi Hayakawa; Akiyoshi Osaka; Takuji Asano
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Histological assessment of porous custom-made hydroxyapatite implants 6 months and 2.5 years after cranioplasty.

Authors:  Hajime Ono; Taigen Sase; Yuichiro Tanaka; Hiroshi Takasuna
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-01-19

9.  The evaluation of the possibilities of using PLGA co-polymer and its composites with carbon fibers or hydroxyapatite in the bone tissue regeneration process - in vitro and in vivo examinations.

Authors:  Magdalena Cieślik; Anna Mertas; Anna Morawska-Chochół; Daniel Sabat; Rajmund Orlicki; Aleksander Owczarek; Wojciech Król; Tadeusz Cieślik
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.208

10.  Skull Bone Regeneration Using Chitosan⁻Siloxane Porous Hybrids-Long-Term Implantation.

Authors:  Yuki Shirosaki; Motomasa Furuse; Takuji Asano; Yoshihiko Kinoshita; Toshihiko Kuroiwa
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 6.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.