Literature DB >> 11685351

Intra-observer variability in APACHE II scoring.

K H Polderman1, H M Christiaans, J P Wester, J J Spijkstra, A R Girbes.   

Abstract

Although the APACHE II score is the most widely used scoring system in intensive care units worldwide, its reliability and variability have not been extensively studied. Differences in case-mix may complicate comparison and interpretation of results. We hypothesised that a degree of variability might be inherent to use of the APACHE II scoring system, and decided to assess intra-observer variability in APACHE II scoring as a potential indicator of inherent score variability. APACHE II scores were assessed twice from the charts of 11 patients by 14 physicians, with a time interval of 4 (range 3.5-4.5) months between the two assessments. Intra-observer was found to be approximately 15%. These findings are in agreement with previous observations regarding inter-observer variability in APACHE II scoring, and strongly suggest that there is an inherent score variability of about 15%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11685351     DOI: 10.1007/s001340101033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  11 in total

1.  Using risk adjustment systems in the ICU: avoid scoring an "own goal".

Authors:  Kees H Polderman; Philipp G H Metnitz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Effect of training and strict guidelines on the reliability of risk adjustment systems in paediatric intensive care.

Authors:  Jolanda G van Keulen; Reinoud J B J Gemke; Kees H Polderman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Informatics infrastructure for syndrome surveillance, decision support, reporting, and modeling of critical illness.

Authors:  Vitaly Herasevich; Brian W Pickering; Yue Dong; Steve G Peters; Ognjen Gajic
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Reliability of PRISM and PIM scores in paediatric intensive care.

Authors:  J G van Keulen; K H Polderman; R J B J Gemke
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  Role of tissue disorder markers in the evaluation of disease progress and outcome prediction: a prospective cohort study in non-cardiac critically ill patients.

Authors:  Jing Ye; Zi Chen; Tingsong Wang; Jianjing Tong; Xiaoguang Li; Jie Jiang; Erzhen Chen; Yiming Lu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.352

6.  Reproducibility of physiological track-and-trigger warning systems for identifying at-risk patients on the ward.

Authors:  Christian P Subbe; Haiyan Gao; David A Harrison
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  A genomic score prognostic of outcome in trauma patients.

Authors:  H Shaw Warren; Constance M Elson; Douglas L Hayden; David A Schoenfeld; J Perren Cobb; Ronald V Maier; Lyle L Moldawer; Ernest E Moore; Brian G Harbrecht; Kimberly Pelak; Joseph Cuschieri; David N Herndon; Marc G Jeschke; Celeste C Finnerty; Bernard H Brownstein; Laura Hennessy; Philip H Mason; Ronald G Tompkins
Journal:  Mol Med       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 6.354

8.  Automatic calculation of the nine equivalents of nursing manpower use score (NEMS) using a patient data management system.

Authors:  Axel Junger; Florian Brenck; Bernd Hartmann; Joachim Klasen; Lorenzo Quinzio; Matthias Benson; Achim Michel; Rainer Röhrig; Gunter Hempelmann
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Mapping physicians' admission diagnoses to structured concepts towards fully automatic calculation of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation score.

Authors:  Subhash Chandra; Rahul Kashyap; Cesar A Trillo-Alvarez; Mykola Tsapenko; Murat Yilmaz; Andrew C Hanson; Brian W Pickering; Ognjen Gajic; Vitaly Herasevich
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Is the current management of severe sepsis and septic shock really evidence based?

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.