Literature DB >> 11684625

Benefit of bilateral over single internal mammary artery grafts for multiple coronary artery bypass grafting.

M Endo1, H Nishida, Y Tomizawa, H Kasanuki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of bilateral internal mammary artery (BIMA) grafts in isolated CABG. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Beginning in April 1985, elective primary multiple CABG for multivessel disease was performed in 1131 patients. The early and late results of 688 patients who received single internal mammary artery (SIMA) grafts and 443 patients who received BIMA grafts were compared (median follow-up, 6.15 years). Hospital mortality was not significantly different in the SIMA (0.9%) and BIMA (0.9%) groups. Graft patency was 97.3% in the BIMA group and 94.3% in the SIMA group (P<0.0001). The 7-year repeated CABG-free rate was significantly higher in the BIMA group (P=0.026). The 7-year new myocardial infarction-free rate in all patients tended to be higher in the BIMA group (P=0.06). The hazard ratio for all death or repeated CABG in patients with ejection fractions >0.4 and age <71 years was lower in the BIMA group (P=0.0499).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the use of BIMA grafts in patients with in situ coronary artery anastomoses achieves a significantly higher repeated CABG-free rate in all patients compared with the use of SIMA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11684625     DOI: 10.1161/hc4301.098283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  29 in total

1.  Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting: are BIMA better?

Authors:  D P Taggart
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Bilateral internal mammary arteries: evidence and technical considerations.

Authors:  Michael P Vallely; J James B Edelman; Michael K Wilson
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

3.  A meta-analysis comparing bilateral internal mammary artery with left internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Aaron J Weiss; Shan Zhao; David H Tian; David P Taggart; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

4.  Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting.

Authors:  Bruce W Lytle
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

Review 5.  Current status of coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Junjiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-06-18

6.  Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting: Is It Reasonable in Octogenarians?

Authors:  Makoto Hashimoto; Toshihiro Fukui; Shuichiro Takanashi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 7.  Optimal use of arterial grafts during current coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Suzuki Tomoaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Current trends in coronary revascularization.

Authors:  Shannon M Dunlay; Charanjit S Rihal; Thoralf M Sundt; Yariv Gerber; Véronique L Roger
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009-02

9.  Near-infrared spectroscopy for noninvasive evaluation of chest wall ischemia immediately after left internal thoracic artery harvesting.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Takami; Kazuyoshi Tajima; Hiroshi Masumoto
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-06-18

10.  Effect of modified proximal anastomosis of the free right internal thoracic artery: piggyback and foldback techniques.

Authors:  Yasunari Hayashi; Toshiaki Ito; Atsuo Maekawa; Sadanari Sawaki; Masayoshi Tokoro; Junji Yanagisawa; Kenta Murotani
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-12-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.