Literature DB >> 11683811

Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency.

N W Harradine1.   

Abstract

A number of laboratory studies have shown very low levels of archwire friction for self-ligating brackets when compared to conventional ligation methods. However, justifiable reservations have been expressed as to the in vivo relevance of these findings. This study was designed to compare treatment efficiency with conventional fully programmed brackets and Damon SL self-ligating brackets. Thirty consecutively finished cases treated by the author with Damon SL brackets were compared with 30 matched cases treated by the author with conventional brackets. Parallel studies quantified the incidence of technical problems with Damon SL brackets and with conventional ligatures and also the chairside time required for ligation/slide closure and ligature removal/slide opening with these two bracket types. The Damon SL cases required an average of four fewer months and four fewer visits to be treated to an equivalent level of occlusal regularity as measured by the PAR scores.

Year:  2001        PMID: 11683811     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2001.40406.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthod Res        ISSN: 1397-5927


  39 in total

1.  Self-ligating versus Invisalign: analysis of dento-alveolar effects.

Authors:  Chiara Pavoni; Roberta Lione; Giuseppina Laganà; Paola Cozza
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2011-07-18

2.  Comparative evaluation of anchorage loss between self-ligating appliance and Conventional pre-adjusted edgewise appliance using sliding mechanics - A retrospective study.

Authors:  Pankaj Juneja; G Shivaprakash; S S Chopra; P B Kambalyal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2014-04-03

3.  Different bracket-archwire combinations for simulated correction of two-dimensional tooth malalignment: Leveling outcomes and initial force systems.

Authors:  Sue Holtmann; Anna Konermann; Ludger Keilig; Susanne Reimann; Andreas Jäger; Mona Montasser; Tarek El-Bialy; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Effect of archwire qualities and bracket designs on the force systems during leveling of malaligned teeth.

Authors:  W Perrey; A Konermann; L Keilig; S Reimann; A Jäger; C Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 5.  Systematic review on self-ligating vs. conventional brackets: initial pain, number of visits, treatment time.

Authors:  Ales Čelar; Magdalena Schedlberger; Petra Dörfler; Michael Bertl
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  The leveling effectiveness of self-ligating and conventional brackets for complex tooth malalignments.

Authors:  Magali Fansa; Ludger Keilig; Susanne Reimann; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-08-02       Impact factor: 1.938

7.  Long-term stability of dentoalveolar, skeletal, and soft tissue changes after non-extraction treatment with a self-ligating system.

Authors:  Faruk Ayhan Basciftci; Mehmet Akin; Zehra Ileri; Sinem Bayram
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Self-ligating vs conventional brackets as perceived by orthodontists.

Authors:  Chase Prettyman; Al M Best; Steven J Lindauer; Eser Tufekci
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Orthodontic treatment efficiency with self-ligating and conventional edgewise twin brackets: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Kristina Johansson; Fredrik Lundström
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Treatment time, outcome, and anchorage loss comparisons of self-ligating and conventional brackets.

Authors:  Ferdinand M Machibya; Xingfu Bao; Lihua Zhao; Min Hu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.