Literature DB >> 11681736

Costs of counterdefenses to host resistance in a parasitoid of Drosophila.

A R Kraaijeveld1, K A Hutcheson, E C Limentani, H C Godfray.   

Abstract

The ability of a parasitoid to evolve enhanced counterdefenses against host resistance and its possible costs were studied in a Drosophila-parasitoid system. We reared Asobara tabida (Braconidae, Hymenoptera) exclusively on D. melanogaster to impose artificial selection for improved counterdefenses against cellular encapsulation, the main host defense against parasitism. Controls were reared on D. subobscura, the main host of the population of wasps from which the laboratory culture was derived and a species that never encapsulates parasitoids. We observed improved survival and avoidance of encapsulation in all five selection lines compared to their paired control lines, although there was unexpected variation among pairs. Improved survival was associated with parasitoid eggs becoming embedded in host tissue, where they were protected from circulating haemocytes. There were no differences among lines in average adult size, fat content, egg load, or performance on D. subobscura. However, the duration of the egg stage in selection lines was longer than that of control lines, probably because of reduced nutrient and/or oxygen supply when eggs are embedded in host tissue. We suggest that this delay in hatching reduces the probability of parasitoid survival if another parasitoid egg is laid in the same host (superparasitism or multiparasitism) and hence is a cost of enhanced counterdefenses against host resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11681736     DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00830.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  9 in total

1.  Coevolution can reverse predator-prey cycles.

Authors:  Michael H Cortez; Joshua S Weitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Variation in adult life history and stress resistance across five species of Drosophila.

Authors:  N Sharmila Bharathi; N G Prasad; Mallikarjun Shakarad; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  High hemocyte load is associated with increased resistance against parasitoids in Drosophila suzukii, a relative of D. melanogaster.

Authors:  Balint Z Kacsoh; Todd A Schlenke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Immune response to sympatric and allopatric parasites in a snail-trematode interaction.

Authors:  Erik E Osnas; Curtis M Lively
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 3.172

5.  Variation in a Host-Parasitoid Interaction across Independent Populations.

Authors:  Saskya van Nouhuys; Suvi Niemikapee; Ilkka Hanski
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 2.769

6.  Edin Expression in the Fat Body Is Required in the Defense Against Parasitic Wasps in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Leena-Maija Vanha-Aho; Ines Anderl; Laura Vesala; Dan Hultmark; Susanna Valanne; Mika Rämet
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 6.823

7.  Parallel and costly changes to cellular immunity underlie the evolution of parasitoid resistance in three Drosophila species.

Authors:  John E McGonigle; Alexandre B Leitão; Sarah Ommeslag; Sophie Smith; Jonathan P Day; Francis M Jiggins
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  The evolution of constitutive and induced defences to infectious disease.

Authors:  Mike Boots; Alex Best
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 9.  Optimization of native biocontrol agents, with parasitoids of the invasive pest Drosophila suzukii as an example.

Authors:  Astrid Kruitwagen; Leo W Beukeboom; Bregje Wertheim
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.183

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.