Literature DB >> 11681548

Treatment resistant depression and axis I co-morbidity.

T Petersen1, J A Gordon, A Kant, M Fava, J F Rosenbaum, A A Nierenberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment resistant depression (TRD) continues to present a formidable challenge to clinicians, accounts for over half of the annual costs associated with treatment for depression and causes great frustration to patients. Although there have been studies attempting to define TRD, little information is available as to the cause of TRD. One suggestion is that patients with TRD have a greater frequency of co-morbid psychiatric disorders, which explains their resistance to standard antidepressant treatments. The objective of this study was to compare the co-morbidity of Axis I disorders between a sample of TRD patients and a sample of non-TRD patients.
METHODS: TRD and non-TRD patients, recruited from two separate antidepressant treatment studies, were assessed for Axis I co-morbidity using the SCID-P for the DSM-III-R. Patients for the two samples were then matched for baseline HAM-D-17 total score and gender.
RESULTS: Results reveal that non-TRD patients had a higher rate of both lifetime and current generalized anxiety disorder co-morbidity than did the TRD patients. No other statistically significant differences in Axis I co-morbidity were found.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings do not support the idea that current or lifetime Axis I co-morbidity is more common in TRD than non-TRD patients. In fact, the only statistical difference showed non-TRD patients with higher co-morbidity rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11681548     DOI: 10.1017/s0033291701004305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Med        ISSN: 0033-2917            Impact factor:   7.723


  7 in total

1.  Generalized anxiety disorder within the course of major depressive disorder: examining the utility of the DSM-IV hierarchy rule.

Authors:  Amy E Lawrence; Gabrielle I Liverant; Anthony J Rosellini; Timothy A Brown
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.505

2.  Significantly decreased mRNA levels of BDNF and MEK1 genes in treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Wu Hong; Jinbo Fan; Chengmei Yuan; Chen Zhang; Yingyan Hu; Daihui Peng; Yong Wang; Jia Huang; Zezhi Li; Shunying Yu; Xiaohua Liu; Zhiguo Wu; Jun Chen; Zhenghui Yi; Lin Xu; Yiru Fang
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 3.  Signature-based approaches for informed drug repurposing: targeting CNS disorders.

Authors:  Rammohan Shukla; Nicholas D Henkel; Khaled Alganem; Abdul-Rizaq Hamoud; James Reigle; Rawan S Alnafisah; Hunter M Eby; Ali S Imami; Justin F Creeden; Scott A Miruzzi; Jaroslaw Meller; Robert E Mccullumsmith
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 8.294

4.  The role of ketamine in treatment-resistant depression: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gianluca Serafini; Robert H Howland; Fabiana Rovedi; Paolo Girardi; Mario Amore
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 7.363

5.  miR‑155 mediates inflammatory injury of hippocampal neuronal cells via the activation of microglia.

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Sun; Ming-Fen Song; Hai-Dong Song; Yu-Wen Wang; Ming-Jin Luo; Li-Ming Yin
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.952

6.  Decreased interhemispheric coordination in treatment-resistant depression: a resting-state fMRI study.

Authors:  Wenbin Guo; Feng Liu; Zhimin Xue; Keming Gao; Zhening Liu; Changqing Xiao; Huafu Chen; Jingping Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Pathogenic beliefs among patients with depressive disorders.

Authors:  Adam Neelapaijit; Tinakon Wongpakaran; Nahathai Wongpakaran; Kulvadee Thongpibul
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 2.570

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.