Jennifer DeVoe1, George E Fryer, Alton Straub, Jessica McCann, Gerry Fairbrother. 1. Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Health Policy & Clinical Effectiveness, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. devoej@ohsu.edu
Abstract
CONTEXT: Satisfaction among both physicians and patients is optimal for the delivery of high-quality healthcare. Although some links have been drawn between physician and patient satisfaction, little is known about the degree of satisfaction congruence among physicians and patients living and working in geographic proximity to each other. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify patients and physicians from similar geographic sites and to examine how closely patients' satisfaction with their overall healthcare correlates with physicians' overall career satisfaction in each selected site. METHODS: We undertook a cross-sectional analysis of data from 3 rounds of the Community Tracking Study (CTS) Household and Physician Surveys (1996-1997, 1998-1999, 2000-2001), a nationally representative telephone survey of patients and physicians. We studied randomly selected participants in the 60 CTS communities for a total household population of 179,127 patients and a total physician population of 37,238. Both physicians and patients were asked a variety of questions pertaining to satisfaction. RESULTS: Satisfaction varied by region but was closely correlated between physicians and patients living in the same CTS sites. Physician career satisfaction was more strongly correlated with patient overall healthcare satisfaction than any of the other aspects of the healthcare system (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient 0.628, P<0.001). Patient trust in the physician was also highly correlated with physician career satisfaction (0.566, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite geographic variation, there is a strong correlation between physician and patient satisfaction living in similar geographic locations. Further analysis of this congruence and examination of areas of incongruence between patient and physician satisfaction may aid in improving the healthcare system.
CONTEXT: Satisfaction among both physicians and patients is optimal for the delivery of high-quality healthcare. Although some links have been drawn between physician and patient satisfaction, little is known about the degree of satisfaction congruence among physicians and patients living and working in geographic proximity to each other. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify patients and physicians from similar geographic sites and to examine how closely patients' satisfaction with their overall healthcare correlates with physicians' overall career satisfaction in each selected site. METHODS: We undertook a cross-sectional analysis of data from 3 rounds of the Community Tracking Study (CTS) Household and Physician Surveys (1996-1997, 1998-1999, 2000-2001), a nationally representative telephone survey of patients and physicians. We studied randomly selected participants in the 60 CTS communities for a total household population of 179,127 patients and a total physician population of 37,238. Both physicians and patients were asked a variety of questions pertaining to satisfaction. RESULTS: Satisfaction varied by region but was closely correlated between physicians and patients living in the same CTS sites. Physician career satisfaction was more strongly correlated with patient overall healthcare satisfaction than any of the other aspects of the healthcare system (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient 0.628, P<0.001). Patient trust in the physician was also highly correlated with physician career satisfaction (0.566, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite geographic variation, there is a strong correlation between physician and patient satisfaction living in similar geographic locations. Further analysis of this congruence and examination of areas of incongruence between patient and physician satisfaction may aid in improving the healthcare system.
Authors: David Grembowski; David Paschane; Paula Diehr; Wayne Katon; Diane Martin; Donald L Patrick Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Anthony C Waddimba; Melissa Scribani; Melinda A Hasbrouck; Nicole Krupa; Paul Jenkins; John J May Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Chad D Meyerhoefer; Susan A Sherer; Mary E Deily; Shin-Yi Chou; Xiaohui Guo; Jie Chen; Michael Sheinberg; Donald Levick Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jill A Marsteller; Yea-Jen Hsu; Mei Wen; Jennifer Wolff; Kevin Frick; Lisa Reider; Daniel Scharfstein; Cynthia Boyd; Bruce Leff; Lindsay Schwartz; Lya Karm; Chad Boult Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2013-04-06 Impact factor: 2.459
Authors: JoAnna K Leyenaar; Lisa A Capra; Emily R O'Brien; Laurel K Leslie; Thomas I Mackie Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2014 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: M J Kabir; Z Hassanzadeh-Rostami; H Ashrafian Amiri; S D Nasrollapour Shirvani; A Keshavarzi; S Hosseini Journal: Malays Fam Physician Date: 2019-12-31