J Lötsch1, U Muth-Selbach, I Tegeder, K Brune, G Geisslinger. 1. Center of Pharmacology, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Theodor Stern Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany. jloetsch@em.uni-frankfurt.de
Abstract
AIMS: To assess the pharmacokinetic equivalence of two different formulations of ibuprofen lysinate with special focus on the expected effects. METHODS:Sixteen healthy volunteers received cross-over ibuprofen lysinate as either one tablet of 400 mg ('test') or two tablets of 200 mg ('reference'). Ibuprofen plasma concentrations were followed up for 10 h. Bioequivalence was assessed by standard noncompartmental methods. Ibuprofen plasma concentrations were fitted with a model that took bioinversion of R- to S-ibuprofen into account. RESULTS:Peak plasma concentrations of R- and S-ibuprofen were 18.1 and 20 microg ml(-1) (test), and 18.2 and 20 microg ml(-1) (reference). Areas under the plasma concentration vs. time curves were 39.7 and 67.5 microg ml(-1) h (test), and 41.1 and 68.2 microg ml(-1) h (reference). Clearance of R-ibuprofen was 5.2 (test) and 5 l h(-1) (reference). A specific plasma concentration was reached with the test formulation about 5 min later than with the reference. Parameters from compartmental modelling were (given for R-and then for S-ibuprofen): body clearance: 4.9 and 4.64 l h(-1), central volume of distribution: 2.8 and 4.1 l, intercompartment clearance: 5.1 and 5.45 l h(-1), peripheral volume of distribution: 4.1 and 5.2 l. The absorption rate constant was 1.52 h(-1), and the test but not the reference formulation had a lag time of 0.1 h. Simulations showed similarity between formulations of the expected effects except for a calculated delay of 6 min with the test formulation. CONCLUSIONS:Ibuprofen formulations were bioequivalent. The pharmacokinetic model may serve as a basis for future pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic calculations after administration of racemic ibuprofen.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: To assess the pharmacokinetic equivalence of two different formulations of ibuprofen lysinate with special focus on the expected effects. METHODS: Sixteen healthy volunteers received cross-over ibuprofen lysinate as either one tablet of 400 mg ('test') or two tablets of 200 mg ('reference'). Ibuprofen plasma concentrations were followed up for 10 h. Bioequivalence was assessed by standard noncompartmental methods. Ibuprofen plasma concentrations were fitted with a model that took bioinversion of R- to S-ibuprofen into account. RESULTS: Peak plasma concentrations of R- and S-ibuprofen were 18.1 and 20 microg ml(-1) (test), and 18.2 and 20 microg ml(-1) (reference). Areas under the plasma concentration vs. time curves were 39.7 and 67.5 microg ml(-1) h (test), and 41.1 and 68.2 microg ml(-1) h (reference). Clearance of R-ibuprofen was 5.2 (test) and 5 l h(-1) (reference). A specific plasma concentration was reached with the test formulation about 5 min later than with the reference. Parameters from compartmental modelling were (given for R-and then for S-ibuprofen): body clearance: 4.9 and 4.64 l h(-1), central volume of distribution: 2.8 and 4.1 l, intercompartment clearance: 5.1 and 5.45 l h(-1), peripheral volume of distribution: 4.1 and 5.2 l. The absorption rate constant was 1.52 h(-1), and the test but not the reference formulation had a lag time of 0.1 h. Simulations showed similarity between formulations of the expected effects except for a calculated delay of 6 min with the test formulation. CONCLUSIONS:Ibuprofen formulations were bioequivalent. The pharmacokinetic model may serve as a basis for future pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic calculations after administration of racemic ibuprofen.
Authors: G F Lockwood; K S Albert; W R Gillespie; G G Bole; T M Harkcom; G J Szpunar; J G Wagner Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 1983-07 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Cathy Boscarino; Andrea N Edginton; Henry Peng; K Wayne Riggs; András Szeitz; Bob Cheung Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Carolina de Miranda Silva; Adriana Rocha; Eduardo Tozatto; Lucienir Maria da Silva; Eduardo Antônio Donadi; Teresa Dalla Costa; Vera Lucia Lanchote; Stephan Schmidt; Jürgen B Bulitta Journal: AAPS J Date: 2017-09-05 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Maria M Posada; Ellen A Cannady; Christopher D Payne; Xin Zhang; James A Bacon; Y Anne Pak; J William Higgins; Nazila Shahri; Stephen D Hall; Kathleen M Hillgren Journal: Clin Transl Sci Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 4.689