Literature DB >> 11677192

Environmental public health surveillance: possible estuary-associated syndrome.

L C Backer1, A S Niskar, C Rubin, K Blindauer, D Christianson, L Naeher, H S Rogers.   

Abstract

Public health surveillance involves the collection, analysis, and dissemination of data for use in public health practice. A surveillance system includes the capacity to collect and analyze data as well as the ability to disseminate the data to public health agencies that can undertake effective prevention and control activities. An emerging issue in environmental public health surveillance involves human exposure to the toxins produced by microorganisms present in oceans and estuaries. One of these organisms is Pfiesteria piscicida Steidinger & Burkholder, a dinoflagellate found in estuaries along the Atlantic and gulf coasts of the United States. There have been reports of both human illness associated with occupational exposures to concentrated laboratory cultures of P. piscicida and massive fill kills associated with the presence of the organism in rivers and estuaries. These reports, and anecdotal reports from people who worked on rivers where the organism has been found, generated concern that environmental exposures to P. piscicida, similar organisms, or perhaps a toxin or toxins produced by the organism(s), could cause adverse human health effects. To begin to evaluate the public health burden associated with P. piscicida, investigators from the National Center for Environmental Health at Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and health agencies from states along the Atlantic coast collaborated to develop a passive surveillance system for collecting, classifying, and tracking public inquiries about the organism. Specifically, the group developed exposure and symptom criteria and developed data collection and reporting capabilities to capture the human health parameters collectively referred to as possible estuary-associated syndrome (PEAS). The surveillance system was implemented in six states (Delaware, Florida, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia) beginning in June 1998. From 1 June 1998 through 30 June 2001, the six state health agencies participating in the PEAS surveillance system received 3,859 calls: 3,768 callers requested information and 91 callers reported symptoms. Five individuals have been identified as meeting PEAS criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11677192      PMCID: PMC1240614          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.01109s5797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  9 in total

1.  New 'phantom' dinoflagellate is the causative agent of major estuarine fish kills.

Authors:  J M Burkholder; E J Noga; C H Hobbs; H B Glasgow; S A Smith
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-07-30       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Surveillance in environmental public health: issues, systems, and sources.

Authors:  S B Thacker; D F Stroup; R G Parrish; H A Anderson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Public health surveillance in the United States.

Authors:  S B Thacker; R L Berkelman
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  Fish lesions in the Chesapeake Bay: Pfiesteria-like dinoflagellates and other etiologies.

Authors:  A S Kane; D Oldach; R Reimschuessel
Journal:  Md Med J       Date:  1998-05

Review 5.  Etiologies, observations and reporting of estuarine finfish lesions.

Authors:  A S Kane; M J Dykstra; E J Noga; R Reimschuessel; A Baya; C Driscoll; H W Paerl; J Landsberg
Journal:  Mar Environ Res       Date:  2000 Jul-Dec       Impact factor: 3.130

6.  Heteroduplex mobility assay-guided sequence discovery: elucidation of the small subunit (18S) rDNA sequences of Pfiesteria piscicida and related dinoflagellates from complex algal culture and environmental sample DNA pools.

Authors:  D W Oldach; C F Delwiche; K S Jakobsen; T Tengs; E G Brown; J W Kempton; E F Schaefer; H A Bowers; H B Glasgow; J M Burkholder; K A Steidinger; P A Rublee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-04-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Learning and memory difficulties after environmental exposure to waterways containing toxin-producing Pfiesteria or Pfiesteria-like dinoflagellates.

Authors:  L M Grattan; D Oldach; T M Perl; M H Lowitt; D L Matuszak; C Dickson; C Parrott; R C Shoemaker; C L Kauffman; M P Wasserman; J R Hebel; P Charache; J G Morris
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Insidious effects of a toxic estuarine dinoflagellate on fish survival and human health.

Authors:  H B Glasgow; J M Burkholder; D E Schmechel; P A Tester; P A Rublee
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1995-12

9.  Reporter gene assay for fish-killing activity produced by Pfiesteria piscicida.

Authors:  E R Fairey; J S Edmunds; N J Deamer-Melia; H Glasgow; F M Johnson; P R Moeller; J M Burkholder; J S Ramsdell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Are Pfiesteria species toxicogenic? Evidence against production of ichthyotoxins by Pfiesteria shumwayae.

Authors:  J P Berry; K S Reece; K S Rein; D G Baden; L W Haas; W L Ribeiro; J D Shields; R V Snyder; W K Vogelbein; R E Gawley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Emerging areas of research reported during the CDC National Conference on Pfiesteria: from biology to public health.

Authors:  C Rubin; M A McGeehin; A K Holmes; L Backer; G Burreson; M C Earley; D Griffith; R Levine; W Litaker; J Mei; L Naeher; L Needham; E Noga; M Poli; H S Rogers
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.031

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.