Literature DB >> 11673654

Searching for pharmacogenomic markers: the synergy between omic and hypothesis-driven research.

J N Weinstein1.   

Abstract

With 35,000 genes and hundreds of thousands of protein states to identify, correlate, and understand, it no longer suffices to rely on studies of one gene, gene product, or process at a time. We have entered the "omic" era in biology. But large-scale omic studies of cellular molecules in aggregate rarely can answer interesting questions without the assistance of information from traditional hypothesis-driven research. The two types of science are synergistic. A case in point is the set of pharmacogenomic studies that we and our collaborators have done with the 60 human cancer cell lines of the National Cancer Institute's drug discovery program. Those cells (the NCI-60) have been characterized pharmacologically with respect to their sensitivity to >70,000 chemical compounds. We are further characterizing them at the DNA, RNA, protein, and functional levels. Our major aim is to identify pharmacogenomic markers that can aid in drug discovery and design, as well as in individualization of cancer therapy. The bioinformatic and chemoinformatic challenges of this study have demanded novel methods for analysis and visualization of high-dimensional data. Included are the color-coded "clustered image map" and also the MedMiner program package, which captures and organizes the biomedical literature on gene-gene and gene-drug relationships. Microarray transcript expression studies of the 60 cell lines reveal, for example, a gene-drug correlation with potential clinical implications--that between the asparagine synthetase gene and the enzyme-drug L-asparaginase in ovarian cancer cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11673654      PMCID: PMC3851640          DOI: 10.1155/2001/435746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Markers        ISSN: 0278-0240            Impact factor:   3.434


  7 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers, validation and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling.

Authors:  Wayne A Colburn; Jean W Lee
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Guidelines for the design, analysis and interpretation of 'omics' data: focus on human endometrium.

Authors:  Signe Altmäe; Francisco J Esteban; Anneli Stavreus-Evers; Carlos Simón; Linda Giudice; Bruce A Lessey; Jose A Horcajadas; Nick S Macklon; Thomas D'Hooghe; Cristina Campoy; Bart C Fauser; Lois A Salamonsen; Andres Salumets
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 15.610

3.  Clinical course and outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and asparaginase-associated pancreatitis.

Authors:  Susan L Kearney; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Donna E Levy; Stephan D Voss; Stephen E Sallan; Lewis B Silverman
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.167

4.  Development of Orthogonal Linear Separation Analysis (OLSA) to Decompose Drug Effects into Basic Components.

Authors:  Tadahaya Mizuno; Setsuo Kinoshita; Takuya Ito; Shotaro Maedera; Hiroyuki Kusuhara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  B.E.A.R. GeneInfo: a tool for identifying gene-related biomedical publications through user modifiable queries.

Authors:  Guohui Zhou; Xinyu Wen; Hang Liu; Michael J Schlicht; Martin J Hessner; Peter J Tonellato; Milton W Datta
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  HLA class I and II genotype of the NCI-60 cell lines.

Authors:  Sharon Adams; Fu-Meei Robbins; Deborah Chen; Devika Wagage; Susan L Holbeck; Herbert C Morse; David Stroncek; Francesco M Marincola
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 7.  Translational genomics in cancer research: converting profiles into personalized cancer medicine.

Authors:  Lalit Patel; Brittany Parker; Da Yang; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.248

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.