BACKGROUND: Although the APOE epsilon 4 allele increases the risk of developing AD, the effects of the epsilon 4 allele on brain atrophy in clinical AD patients are controversial. OBJECTIVE: To investigate a possible relationship between the genetic variants of APOE and brain atrophy in patients with AD. METHODS: Using MRI-based volumetry techniques, the authors compared the volumes of the hippocampal formation, amygdaloid complex, and whole brain in probable AD patients (based on criteria of the National Institute for Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke/Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association) with different APOE alleles. One group (n = 46) had the epsilon 3/3 allele, one group (n = 46) had the epsilon 3/4 allele, and one group (n = 46) had the epsilon 4/4 allele. The three groups were matched for age, sex, disease duration, education level, and severity of dementia represented by their score of the Mini-Mental State Examination. A possible difference in pattern of cognitive deficits with dose of the APOE epsilon 4 allele was also examined. RESULTS: The normalized hippocampal volume was correlated with the number of APOE epsilon 4 alleles (r = -0.285, p = 0.0007). The amygdalar volume was also correlated with the number of APOE epsilon 4 alleles (r = -0.178, p = 0.037). The number of APOE epsilon 4 alleles was positively correlated with the whole-brain volume (r = 0.185, p = 0.030). It was also correlated with Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised performance IQ (r = 0.203, p = 0.017) and with Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised attention/concentration score (r = 0.191, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Different patterns of regional brain atrophy were found among patients of different APOE genotypes. The effect of APOE epsilon 4 allele on the brains of AD patients may have regional specificity.
BACKGROUND: Although the APOE epsilon 4 allele increases the risk of developing AD, the effects of the epsilon 4 allele on brain atrophy in clinical ADpatients are controversial. OBJECTIVE: To investigate a possible relationship between the genetic variants of APOE and brain atrophy in patients with AD. METHODS: Using MRI-based volumetry techniques, the authors compared the volumes of the hippocampal formation, amygdaloid complex, and whole brain in probable ADpatients (based on criteria of the National Institute for Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke/Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association) with different APOE alleles. One group (n = 46) had the epsilon 3/3 allele, one group (n = 46) had the epsilon 3/4 allele, and one group (n = 46) had the epsilon 4/4 allele. The three groups were matched for age, sex, disease duration, education level, and severity of dementia represented by their score of the Mini-Mental State Examination. A possible difference in pattern of cognitive deficits with dose of the APOE epsilon 4 allele was also examined. RESULTS: The normalized hippocampal volume was correlated with the number of APOE epsilon 4 alleles (r = -0.285, p = 0.0007). The amygdalar volume was also correlated with the number of APOE epsilon 4 alleles (r = -0.178, p = 0.037). The number of APOE epsilon 4 alleles was positively correlated with the whole-brain volume (r = 0.185, p = 0.030). It was also correlated with Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised performance IQ (r = 0.203, p = 0.017) and with Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised attention/concentration score (r = 0.191, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Different patterns of regional brain atrophy were found among patients of different APOE genotypes. The effect of APOE epsilon 4 allele on the brains of ADpatients may have regional specificity.
Authors: T C Lye; D A Grayson; H Creasey; O Piguet; H P Bennett; L J Ridley; J J Kril; G A Broe Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2005-12-20 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Michal Schnaider Beeri; Jeremy M Silverman; Kenneth L Davis; Deborah Marin; Hillel Z Grossman; James Schmeidler; Dushyant P Purohit; Daniel P Perl; Michael Davidson; Richard C Mohs; Vahram Haroutunian Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Po H Lu; Paul M Thompson; Alex Leow; Grace J Lee; Agatha Lee; Igor Yanovsky; Neelroop Parikshak; Theresa Khoo; Stephanie Wu; Daniel Geschwind; George Bartzokis Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2011 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Jessica M Foley; David H Salat; Nikki H Stricker; Tyler A Zink; Laura J Grande; Regina E McGlinchey; William P Milberg; Elizabeth C Leritz Journal: Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen Date: 2013-12-31 Impact factor: 2.035
Authors: Geoffrey A Kerchner; Daniela Berdnik; Jadon C Shen; Jeffrey D Bernstein; Michelle C Fenesy; Gayle K Deutsch; Tony Wyss-Coray; Brian K Rutt Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Josephine Barnes; Bradford C Dickerson; Chris Frost; Lize C Jiskoot; David Wolk; Wiesje M van der Flier Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: J M Serra-Grabulosa; P Salgado-Pineda; C Junqué; C Solé-Padullés; P Moral; A López-Alomar; T López; A López-Guillén; N Bargalló; J M Mercader; I C Clemente; D Bartrés-Faz Journal: Neurogenetics Date: 2002-12-21 Impact factor: 2.660