Literature DB >> 1167129

Rates of passage of digesta and water absorption along the larg intestines of sheep, cows and pigs.

J F Hecker, W L Grovum.   

Abstract

In 5 cows, the mean length of the large intestine was only slightly greater than that of 21 sheep and 3 pigs. At about one-fifth of the way along the large intestine of the sheep and cows, corresponding to the end of the proximal colon and start of the spiral colon, there were marked reductions in the amount of digesta present and in the lumen diameter. In pigs these parameters decreased gradually along the large intestine. In all parts of the large intestine, the cows had more water in the digesta than did the sheep or the pigs. Nevertheless, the decrease in water content between the caecum and the rectum was similar for the cows and the sheep but less in the pigs. The rate of passage of digesta increased gradually along the large intestine of the pigs, but in the cows and sheep the rate was least in the caecum and proximal colon and greatest in the spiral colon. The total retention time for digesta in the large intestine was approximately 30, 20, and 9 h in the pigs, sheep, and cows respectively. The rate of water absorption from the large intestine was most rapid in the cows and slowest in the pigs. Differences in faecal water content between the species were not due to differences in retention times in the large intestine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1167129     DOI: 10.1071/bi9750161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Biol Sci        ISSN: 0004-9417


  13 in total

1.  Colonization of cattle intestines by Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter lanienae.

Authors:  G Douglas Inglis; Lisa D Kalischuk; Hilma W Busz; John P Kastelic
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Physical characteristics of digesta and their influence on flow and mixing in the mammalian intestine: a review.

Authors:  R G Lentle; P W M Janssen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 2.200

3.  Comparison of cattle and sheep colonic permeabilities to horseradish peroxidase and hamster scrapie prion protein in vitro.

Authors:  A T McKie; P S Zammit; R J Naftalin
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Evidence from fluorescence microscopy and comparative studies that rat, ovine and bovine colonic crypts are absorptive.

Authors:  K C Pedley; R J Naftalin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Regional differences in rat large intestinal crypt function in relation to dehydrating capacity in vivo.

Authors:  R J Naftalin; P S Zammit; K C Pedley
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Effects on fluid and Na+ flux of varying luminal hydraulic resistance in rat colon in vivo.

Authors:  P S Zammit; M Mendizabal; R J Naftalin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1994-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Concentration polarization of fluorescent dyes in rat descending colonic crypts: evidence of crypt fluid absorption.

Authors:  R J Naftalin; P S Zammit; K C Pedley
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Motor profile of the ruminant colon: hard vs soft faeces production.

Authors:  Y Ruckebusch; J Fioramonti
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1980-10-15

9.  Models of antimicrobial pressure on intestinal bacteria of the treated host populations.

Authors:  V V Volkova; C L Cazer; Y T Gröhn
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 4.434

Review 10.  Expression, Distribution and Role of Aquaporin Water Channels in Human and Animal Stomach and Intestines.

Authors:  Cui Zhu; Zhuang Chen; Zongyong Jiang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.