Literature DB >> 11669394

Long-term frequency tuning of local field potentials in the auditory cortex of the waking guinea pig.

V V Galván1, J Chen, N M Weinberger.   

Abstract

The goal of our study was to determine the extent of changes in frequency tuning in the auditory cortex over weeks. The subjects were awake adult male guinea pigs (n = 8) bearing electrodes chronically implanted in layers IV-VI of primary auditory cortex. Tuning was determined by presenting sequences of pure tone bursts (approximately 0.97-41.97 kHz, -20 to 80 dB, 100-ms tone duration, 5-ms rise-fall, 800-ms intertone intervals, 1.5-s intersequence interval) either in 0.5-octave steps (n = 5, 14 probes) or 0.25-octave steps (n = 3, 9 probes) delivered to the ear contralateral to recording sites. Tuning curves were determined for local field potentials (LFPs), which were tuned to frequency (negative potential, latency to peak 15-20 ms), repeatedly for up to 27 days (0.5 octave) or 12 days (0.25 octave). Characteristic frequency (CF), best frequency at 10 and 30 dB above absolute threshold (BF10, BF30), threshold (TH), and bandwidth (10 dB above threshold; BW) were measured. Absolute amplitude often decreased across weeks, necessitating normalization of amplitude. However, there were no significant trends in tuning over days for CF, BF10, or BF30 for either the half- or the quarter-octave group. Both groups exhibited random daily variations in frequency tuning, the quarter-octave group revealing larger variations averaging 0.228, 0.211, and 0.250 octave for CF, BF10, and BF30, respectively. Therefore, frequency tuning in waking animals does not exhibit directional drift over very long periods of time. However, daily tuning variations on the order of 0.20-0.25 octave indicate that the peaks of tuning curves (CF, BF) represent a preferred frequency range rather than a fixed frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11669394      PMCID: PMC3201668          DOI: 10.1007/s101620010062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  9 in total

Review 1.  Specific long-term memory traces in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 2.  Associative representational plasticity in the auditory cortex: a synthesis of two disciplines.

Authors:  Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 3.  Does attention play a role in dynamic receptive field adaptation to changing acoustic salience in A1?

Authors:  Jonathan B Fritz; Mounya Elhilali; Stephen V David; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Auditory associative memory and representational plasticity in the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Functional connectivity and cholinergic modulation in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Raju Metherate
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Increasing spectrotemporal sound density reveals an octave-based organization in cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Arnaud J Noreña; Boris Gourévitch; Martin Pienkowski; Greg Shaw; Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Rapid induction of specific associative behavioral memory by stimulation of the nucleus basalis in the rat.

Authors:  Alexandre A Miasnikov; Jemmy C Chen; Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2006-02-08       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Conditioned tone control of brain reward behavior produces highly specific representational gain in the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Gabriel K Hui; Kwan L Wong; Candice M Chavez; Matthew I Leon; Kinna M Robin; Norman M Weinberger
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Local field potentials are local events in the mouse auditory cortex.

Authors:  Xiuping Liu; Linran Zhou; Fangchao Ding; Yehan Wang; Jun Yan
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.386

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.