Literature DB >> 11669204

Mortality among the Chernobyl emergency workers: estimation of radiation risks (preliminary analysis).

V K Ivanov1, A I Gorski, M A Maksioutov, A F Tsyb, G N Souchkevitch.   

Abstract

This paper presents results of the analysis of mortality among Chernobyl accident emergency workers who are resident in Russia. The analysis is based on information for the cohort of emergency workers (males) from six regions of Russia including 65,905 persons with documented external doses in the range 0.005-03 Sv. These data were gathered during the period 1991 to 1998 and cover a total of 426,304 follow-up person-y. In this period, 4,995 deaths occurred in the cohort under study. The mortality analysis was performed for four groups of causes of death (ICD-9 codes): (1) malignant neoplasms (140-239); (2) cardiovascular diseases (390-459); (3) injuries, poisoning and violent deaths, (800-999); and (4) the remainder (other than the above). The standardized mortality rate for groups 1, 3, and 4 is less than unity and varies from 0.6 to 0.9. For group 2 (death from cardiovascular diseases) the standardized mortality rate conforms with the control within 95% confidence intervals. The control was the mortality rate (males) for the corresponding ages in Russia in general and the internal control, the spontaneous mortality among emergency workers, derived from the equation of the observed and expected number of cases in the followed up cohort. Dose response of mortality was studied. Statistically significant radiation risks were obtained for mortality from malignant neoplasms (515 cases) and cardiovascular diseases (1,728 cases). The values of the excess relative risk per unit dose (ERR Sv(-1)) for malignant neoplasms and cardiovascular diseases are estimated as 2.11 (1.31, 2.92 95% CI) and 0.54 (0.18,0.91 95% CI) (for external control), 2.04 (0.45, 4.31 95% CI) and 0.79 (0.07, 1.64 95% CI) (for internal control), respectively. The risk of death from all noncancer causes is close to zero and not statistically significant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11669204     DOI: 10.1097/00004032-200111000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  11 in total

1.  Sparsely ionizing diagnostic and natural background radiations are likely preventing cancer and other genomic-instability-associated diseases.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Jennifer Di Palma
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Risks of circulatory diseases among Mayak PA workers with radiation doses estimated using the improved Mayak Worker Dosimetry System 2008.

Authors:  Maria B Moseeva; Tamara V Azizova; Evgenia S Grigoryeva; Richard Haylock
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Cerebrovascular diseases in nuclear workers first employed at the Mayak PA in 1948-1972.

Authors:  Tamara V Azizova; Colin R Muirhead; Maria B Moseeva; Evgenia S Grigoryeva; Margarita V Sumina; Jacqueline O'Hagan; Wei Zhang; Richard J G E Haylock; Nezahat Hunter
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 1.925

Review 4.  Radiation and circulatory disease.

Authors:  Mark P Little
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 5.657

5.  Solid cancer incidence among the Chernobyl emergency workers residing in Russia: estimation of radiation risks.

Authors:  V K Ivanov; A I Gorski; A F Tsyb; S I Ivanov; R N Naumenko; L V Ivanova
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Threshold and other departures from linear-quadratic curvature in the non-cancer mortality dose-response curve in the Japanese atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  Mark P Little
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2004-06-19       Impact factor: 1.925

7.  Latent period in induction of radiogenic solid tumors in the cohort of emergency workers.

Authors:  Victor K Ivanov; A I Gorsky; V V Kashcheev; M A Maksioutov; K A Tumanov
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Probability Distribution of Dose and Dose-Rate Effectiveness Factor for use in Estimating Risks of Solid Cancers From Exposure to Low-Let Radiation.

Authors:  David C Kocher; A Iulian Apostoaei; F Owen Hoffman; John R Trabalka
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  Single exposure gamma-irradiation amplifies xanthine oxidase activity and induces endothelial dysfunction in rat aorta.

Authors:  Kevin G Soucy; Hyun Kyo Lim; Alexandre Benjo; Lakshmi Santhanam; Sungwoo Ryoo; Artin A Shoukas; Marcelo E Vazquez; Dan E Berkowitz
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 2.017

Review 10.  Is cancer risk of radiation workers larger than expected?

Authors:  P Jacob; W Rühm; L Walsh; M Blettner; G Hammer; H Zeeb
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.