Literature DB >> 11660384

Huntington disease: a case study describing the complexities and nuances of predictive testing of monozygotic twins.

Audrey Heimler, Andrea Zanko.   

Abstract

When a candidate for predictive testing for the Huntington disease gene is a monozygotic twin, confidentiality of the co-twin's diagnosis and autonomy of participation are among the critical genetic counseling issues. Predictive testing can proceed when twins voluntarily and simultaneously request counseling and evaluation in an HD testing program. This case describes a young man referred for predictive testing to an HD testing site on the East Coast of the United States. Family history revealed a twin brother of unknown zygosity who resided on the West Coast of the United States. The genetic counselors on opposite coasts collaborated to provide genetic counseling and evaluation for voluntary, informed predictive testing of the twins, protecting their rights while observing national protocol guidelines

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 11660384     DOI: 10.1007/bf01408635

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  12 in total

1.  Predictive testing for adult-onset genetic disease: ethical and legal implications of the use of linkage analysis for Huntington disease.

Authors:  M A Chapman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington's disease chromosomes. The Huntington's Disease Collaborative Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-03-26       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  A polymorphic DNA marker genetically linked to Huntington's disease.

Authors:  J F Gusella; N S Wexler; P M Conneally; S L Naylor; M A Anderson; R E Tanzi; P C Watkins; K Ottina; M R Wallace; A Y Sakaguchi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983 Nov 17-23       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Ethical issues policy statement on Huntington's disease molecular genetics predictive test. International Huntington Association. World Federation of Neurology.

Authors:  L Went
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Attitudes toward direct predictive testing for the Huntington disease gene. Relevance for other adult-onset disorders. The Canadian Collaborative Group on Predictive Testing for Huntington Disease.

Authors:  R Babul; S Adam; B Kremer; S Dufrasne; S Wiggins; M Huggins; J Theilmann; M Bloch; M R Hayden
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  The psychological consequences of predictive testing for Huntington's disease. Canadian Collaborative Study of Predictive Testing.

Authors:  S Wiggins; P Whyte; M Huggins; S Adam; J Theilmann; M Bloch; S B Sheps; M T Schechter; M R Hayden
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Predictive testing for Huntington's disease: protocol of the UK Huntington's Prediction Consortium.

Authors:  D Craufurd; A Tyler
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Proceed with care: direct predictive testing for Huntington disease.

Authors:  C M Benjamin; S Adam; S Wiggins; J L Theilmann; T T Copley; M Bloch; F Squitieri; W McKellin; S Cox; S A Brown
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Ethical and legal dilemmas arising during predictive testing for adult-onset disease: the experience of Huntington disease.

Authors:  M Huggins; M Bloch; S Kanani; O W Quarrell; J Theilman; A Hedrick; B Dickens; A Lynch; M Hayden
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Presymptomatic testing for huntington diseases: Recommendations for counseling.

Authors:  K A Quaid
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.537

View more
  5 in total

1.  Testing for HD in twins.

Authors:  Elsa Reich; Andrea Zanko; Audrey Heimler
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Paternalistic and protective?

Authors:  Susan E Hodge
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Whose gene is it? A case discussion about familial conflict over genetic testing for breast cancer.

Authors:  Ronald M Green; A Mathew Thomas
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Conference report--highlights of the 4th EMBO/EMBL joint conference on genetics, determinism and human freedom, November 14-15, 2003; Heidelberg, Germany.

Authors:  Elena Armandola
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2004-02-09

5.  Letters to the editor.

Authors:  A Heimler; S E Hodge
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.537

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.