Literature DB >> 11657427

Value neutrality and nondirectiveness: comments on "Future directions in genetic counseling.

Sonia M Suter.   

Abstract

Common wisdom in genetic counseling, which is supported by Biesecker, holds that counselors should strive not to influence their clients' decision making. Such a presumption of nondirectiveness is challenged in this commentary.

Keywords:  Genetics and Reproduction; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh：

Year:  1998        PMID： 11657427     DOI： 10.1353/ken.1998.0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J        ISSN： 1054-6863


  4 in total

1.  Exploring genetic counseling communication patterns: the role of teaching and counseling approaches.

Authors:  Lee Ellington; Bonnie J Baty; Jamie McDonald; Vickie Venne; Adrian Musters; Debra Roter; William Dudley; Robert T Croyle
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Ethical signposts for clinical geneticists in secondary variant and incidental finding disclosure discussions.

Authors:  Gabrielle M Christenhusz; Koenraad Devriendt; Hilde Van Esch; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2015-08

3.  Genetic Counseling-Stress, Coping, and the Empowerment Perspective.

Authors:  A McConkie-Rosell; J A Sullivan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Back to the Future of Genetic Counseling: Commentary on "Psychosocial Genetic Counseling in the Post-Nondirective Era".

Authors:  Barbara Bowles Biesecker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.537
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.