Literature DB >> 11657222

Patients' rights or family responsibilities? Two approaches to genetic testing.

Loane Skene.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Council of Europe; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 11657222     DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/6.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Law Rev        ISSN: 0967-0742            Impact factor:   1.267


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Balancing autonomy and responsibility: the ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information.

Authors:  N Hallowell; C Foster; R Eeles; A Ardern-Jones; V Murday; M Watson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Letting the family know: balancing ethics and effectiveness when notifying relatives about genetic testing for a familial disorder.

Authors:  G K Suthers; J Armstrong; J McCormack; D Trott
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Incorporating exclusion clauses into informed consent for biobanking.

Authors:  Zubin Master; David B Resnik
Journal:  Camb Q Healthc Ethics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  Partnering in oncogenetic research--the INHERIT BRCAs experience: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Denise Avard; Peter Bridge; Lucie M Bucci; Jocelyne Chiquette; Michel Dorval; Francine Durocher; Doug Easton; Béatrice Godard; David Goldgar; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Rachel Laframboise; Bernard Lespérance; Marie Plante; Sean V Tavtigian; Hélène Vézina; Brenda Wilson; Jacques Simard
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Adolescent carrier testing in practice: the impact of legal rulings and problems with "gillick competence".

Authors:  Paula Boddington; Maggie Gregory
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 2.537

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.