Literature DB >> 11653028

'Collective fictions': similarities in reasons for accepting maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein screening among women of diverse ethnic and social class backgrounds.

Nancy Anne Press1, C H Browner.   

Abstract

We analyzed the decisions of an ethnically and socioeconomically diverse group of women to accept or refuse a prenatal diagnostic test. We found that how women were informed about the test and the kind of information they were given determined their decisions more than their ethnic or social class background. To explain this, we argue that the women and their health care providers created a 'collective fiction' which situated the testing within the domain of routine prenatal care and denied its central connection to selective abortion and its eugenic implications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 11653028     DOI: 10.1159/000263878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther        ISSN: 1015-3837            Impact factor:   2.587


  9 in total

1.  Nursing and genetic health care.

Authors:  D H Lea; J K Williams; S T Tinley
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Nondirectiveness in genetic counseling: an empirical study.

Authors:  S Michie; F Bron; M Bobrow; T M Marteau
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Genetic Counseling, Professional Values, and Habitus: An Analysis of Disability Narratives in Textbooks.

Authors:  Amy R Reed
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  2018-12

4.  Dr. Pangloss's Clinic: Prenatal Whole Genome Sequencing and a Return to Reality.

Authors:  Megan Allyse; James P Evans; Marsha Michie
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 5.  Latinx individuals' knowledge of, preferences for, and experiences with prenatal genetic testing: a scoping review.

Authors:  Natalie Grafft; Andrew A Dwyer; María Pineros-Leano
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 3.355

6.  Ambivalence toward undergoing invasive prenatal testing: an exploration of its origins.

Authors:  Julie Chevalier Sapp; Sara Chandros Hull; Shelby Duffer; Sarah Zornetzer; Erica Sutton; Theresa M Marteau; Barbara Bowles Biesecker
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Perceptions of prenatal testing for birth defects among rural Latinas.

Authors:  Courtney Griffiths; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2007-10-05

8.  Is preparation a good reason for prenatal genetic testing? Ethical and critical questions.

Authors:  Marsha Michie
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 2.344

9.  Routine antenatal HIV testing: the responses and perceptions of pregnant women and the viability of informed consent. A qualitative study.

Authors:  Paquita de Zulueta; Mary Boulton
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.903

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.