Literature DB >> 11641658

Relationship of twin zygosity and risk of preeclampsia.

C V Maxwell1, E Lieberman, M Norton, A Cohen, E W Seely, A Lee-Parritz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Twin gestations are known to be at higher risk for preeclampsia. One theory suggests that maternal recognition of fetal and trophoblastic tissues as foreign may be a factor. If that hypothesis is true, mothers carrying monozygous (MZ) gestations (ie a single fetal graft) might be predicted to have a lower rate of preeclampsia than those carrying dizygous (DZ) gestations. To evaluate this hypothesis, we compared the rate of preeclampsia in mothers with MZ and DZ twin gestations. STUDY
DESIGN: Seven hundred sixty-eight twin deliveries from 1994 to 1999 were reviewed. Placental pathology reports were reviewed to determine the chorionic state of each placenta. Monochorionic placentas were assumed to be MZ. Dichorionic placentas were categorized as DZ if the neonates were of different sexes or different blood types. Maternal and fetal data were abstracted from the medical records. Preeclampsia was defined by standard criteria of the National Institutes of Health Working Group on High Blood Pressure. Our analysis was limited to women with pregnancies reaching at least 30 weeks of gestation where zygosity could be determined.
RESULTS: Our analysis included 464 twin pregnancies, 154 MZ and 310 DZ. Among nulliparous women, the rate of preeclampsia was 15% (25/170) for DZ twins versus 20% (15/75) for MZ twins (P =.3). Among multiparous women, the rate was 8% (11/140) for DZ twins and 5% (4/79) for MZ twins (P =.4). In a logistic regression performed to control for confounding by maternal age, gestational age at delivery, assisted reproduction, and male sex, dizygotic state was associated with an odds ratio of 1.4 (95% CI = 0.5-3.9) for developing preeclampsia in nulliparous women and 1.2 in multiparous women (95% CI = 0.3-5.0).
CONCLUSIONS: : These results do not support the hypothesis that zygosity affects the rate of preeclampsia in twin gestations, though the number of subjects in our study was too small to allow definitive conclusions. Larger studies are needed to evaluate this finding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11641658     DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.117352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  4 in total

Review 1.  Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies.

Authors:  Kirsten Duckitt; Deborah Harrington
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-02

2.  Women with multiple gestations have an increased risk of development of hypertension in the future.

Authors:  Geum Joon Cho; Un Suk Jung; Younghan Kim; Min-Jeong Oh; Ho Yeon Kim; Soo Bin Lee; Minjeong Kim; Ki-Hoon Ahn; Sung Won Han; Soon-Cheol Hong; Hai-Joong Kim
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Obesity in young age is a risk factor for preeclampsia: a facility based case-control study, northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Mulualem Endeshaw; Fantu Abebe; Solomon Worku; Lalem Menber; Muluken Assress; Muluken Assefa
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Doppler Velocimetry of the Ophthalmic Artery Behavior in Twin Pregnancy.

Authors:  Viviane Nascimento Pereira Monteiro; Renato Augusto Moreira de Sá; Cristiane Alves de Oliveira; Guillermo Vellarde
Journal:  Ultrasound Q       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.462

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.