Literature DB >> 11607907

Hip function in patients >55 years old: population reference values.

J R Lieberman1, G Hawker, J G Wright.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to establish population values for hip function for patients of different ages using the validated WOMAC scoring system and the traditional Harris hip scoring system. A random sample of 184 individuals who had no prior history of hip or knee pain or pathology was evaluated. The average WOMAC scores for pain, function, and stiffness were 0.01, 1.8, and 0.4. The average Harris hip score was 94 +/- 8.2. No significant correlation was noted between the summary WOMAC score, the WOMAC stiffness or pain subscales, or the overall Harris hip score for any of the 3 age groups studied. Patients with complaints in other joints, such as the back and neck, had lower WOMAC and Harris hip scores. Adults who are healthy and do not have a prior history of hip or knee pathology do not show a significant decline in hip function as they grow older. A deterioration in the function of a total hip arthroplasty over time cannot be attributed solely to the aging process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11607907     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2001.26593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  Prosthetic inlay resurfacing for the treatment of focal, full thickness cartilage defects of the femoral condyle: a bridge between biologics and conventional arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter Bollars; Marc Bosquet; Bruno Vandekerckhove; François Hardeman; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Similar survival of eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy in patients younger and older than 50 years.

Authors:  Jin Yamaguchi; Yukiharu Hasegawa; Toshiya Kanoh; Taisuke Seki; Kiyoharu Kawabe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Evaluating the Functional and Psychological Outcomes Following Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rifat Islam; Brent Lanting; Lyndsay Somerville; Susan W Hunter
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-10-12

4.  Complications and patient satisfaction after periacetabular pelvic osteotomy.

Authors:  R Biedermann; L Donnan; A Gabriel; R Wachter; M Krismer; H Behensky
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The wait for total hip replacement in patients with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Marie-Claire Gaudet; Debbie Ehrmann Feldman; Michel Rossignol; David Zukor; Michael Tanzer; Charles Gravel; Nicholas Newman; Réjean Dumais; Ian Shrier
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Patient-reported outcome after fast-track hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kristian Larsen; Torben B Hansen; Kjeld Søballe; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Quality of life and functionality after total hip arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Massimo Mariconda; Olimpio Galasso; Giovan Giuseppe Costa; Pasquale Recano; Simone Cerbasi
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Good function and high patient satisfaction at mean 2.8 years after dual mobility THA following femoral neck fracture: a cross-sectional study of 124 patients.

Authors:  Steffan Tabori-Jensen; Torben B Hansen; Søren Bøvling; Peter Aalund; Morten Homilius; Maiken Stilling
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 4.458

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.