Literature DB >> 11607331

Foraging ability of rufous hummingbirds on hummingbird flowers and hawkmoth flowers.

V Grant1, E J Temeles.   

Abstract

We examine the suitability of ornithophilous flowers and sphingophilous flowers in Ipompsis and Aquilegia for nectar foraging by the hummingbird Selasphorus rufus. In S. rufus, bill length averages 18.9 mm in females and 17.3 mm in males. Maximal tongue extension approximates bill length, suggesting that birds can feed from floral tubes up to 33.5 mm in length. However, their ability to do so is limited by two factors. First, the maximal depth at which S. rufus can extract nectar decreases with the width of the floral tube. Second, feeding time is shortest in short floral tubes and progressively increases as the tubes lengthen because of increased time required for tongue extension and retraction. Hence, nectar foraging occurs with optimal efficiency in moderately broad floral tubes with lengths that do not exceed or only slightly exceed the bill length plus </=5-mm tongue extension. In most ornithophilous taxa of Ipomopsis and Aquilegia, the floral tubes have lengths and widths in the optimal range for nectar foraging by S. rufus, whereas in the sphingophilous taxa, the basal nectar either may be reached but at much higher cost or, more frequently, is beyond reach of bills and tongues. The flower-visiting habits of S. rufus and other hummingbirds in nature are generally congruent with these conclusions and support the case for coadaptation between these plants and pollinators.

Entities:  

Year:  1992        PMID: 11607331      PMCID: PMC50139          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  2 in total

1.  A hummingbird-pollinated species of boraginaceae in the Arizona flora.

Authors:  V Grant; K A Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  On the tongue of a hummingbird: its role in the rate and energetics of feeding.

Authors:  F R Hainsworth
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol       Date:  1973-09-01
  2 in total
  11 in total

1.  Effects of hybridization and selection on floral isolation.

Authors:  V Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Modes and origins of mechanical and ethological isolation in angiosperms.

Authors:  V Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Origin of floral isolation between ornithophilous and sphingophilous plant species.

Authors:  V Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Specialized bat tongue is a hemodynamic nectar mop.

Authors:  Cally J Harper; Sharon M Swartz; Elizabeth L Brainerd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Assessing Lévy walks as models of animal foraging.

Authors:  Alex James; Michael J Plank; Andrew M Edwards
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  A new dimension to hummingbird-flower relationships.

Authors:  Ethan J Temeles
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Effect of sexual dimorphism in bill length on foraging behavior: an experimental analysis of hummingbirds.

Authors:  Ethan J Temeles; W Mark Roberts
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Effect of floral orifice width and shape on hummingbird-flower interactions.

Authors:  C E Smith; J T Stevens; E J Temeles; P W Ewald; R J Hebert; R L Bonkovsky
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Floral isolation between ornithophilous and sphingophilous species of Ipomopsis and Aquilegia.

Authors:  V Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Floral and ecological isolation between Aquilegia formosa and Aquilegia pubescens.

Authors:  S A Hodges; M L Arnold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.