Literature DB >> 11607136

When can ants discriminate the sex of brood? A new aspect of queen-worker conflict.

P Nonacs1, N F Carlin.   

Abstract

The stage in preimaginal ontogeny at which the sexes can first be distinguished has important implications for queen-worker conflict in social insects. If workers are unable to sex larvae at an early instar, their opportunity to control colony reproductive strategies may be limited. In addition, by concealing the sex of her sons for some portion of development, the queen could protect them from the workers' attempts to substitute their own sons or to skew the numerical sex ratio. In a series of choice experiments, workers of the carpenter ant, Camponotus floridanus, failed to discriminate the sex of several stages of larvae but did retrieve female pupae significantly more rapidly than male pupae. Our results suggest that in this species, sex may not become detectable until pupation, which is consistent with sexual deception as an aspect of queen control.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 11607136      PMCID: PMC55234          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.87.24.9670

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  3 in total

Review 1.  Haploidploidy and the evolution of the social insect.

Authors:  R L Trivers; H Hare
Journal:  Science       Date:  1976-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Do the Nurse Honey Bees Recognize the Sex of the Larvae?

Authors:  M H Haydak
Journal:  Science       Date:  1958-05-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

  3 in total
  13 in total

1.  Kin-selected conflict in the bumble-bee Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae).

Authors:  A F Bourke; F L Ratnieks
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Power over reproduction in social hymenoptera.

Authors:  Madeleine Beekman; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Queen and worker policing in monogynous and monandrous colonies of a primitively eusocial wasp.

Authors:  T Saigo; K Tsuchida
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Patterns of split sex ratio in ants have multiple evolutionary causes based on different within-colony conflicts.

Authors:  Rolf Kümmerli; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  The veil of ignorance can favour biological cooperation.

Authors:  David C Queller; Joan E Strassmann
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Sex allocation conflict in insect societies: who wins?

Authors:  Heikki Helanterä; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Kinship, greenbeards, and runaway social selection in the evolution of social insect cooperation.

Authors:  Peter Nonacs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Nepotism and brood reliability in the suppression of worker reproduction in the eusocial Hymenoptera.

Authors:  Peter Nonacs
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Relatedness threshold for the production of female sexuals in colonies of a polygynous ant, Myrmica tahoensis, as revealed by microsatellite DNA analysis.

Authors:  J D Evans
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Ant workers selfishly bias sex ratios by manipulating female development.

Authors:  R L Hammond; M W Bruford; A F G Bourke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.