Literature DB >> 19656859

Sex allocation conflict in insect societies: who wins?

Heikki Helanterä1, Francis L W Ratnieks.   

Abstract

Sex allocation in colonies of eusocial Hymenoptera is one of the best studied social conflicts. We outline a framework for analysing conflict outcome through power and the costs of manipulation and suggest that the conflict will often be unresolved because both major parties of interest, the queen and the workers, should manipulate allocation even at considerable costs to the colony. We suggest future work for analysing power in the conflict between queen and workers over sex allocation and discuss the extent of male power.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19656859      PMCID: PMC2781979          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  27 in total

1.  Reproductive alliances and posthumous fitness enhancement in male ants.

Authors:  L Sundström; J J Boomsma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Power over reproduction in social hymenoptera.

Authors:  Madeleine Beekman; Francis L W Ratnieks
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Effects of brood manipulation costs on optimal sex allocation in social hymenoptera.

Authors:  Max Reuter; Ken R Helms; Laurent Lehmann; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-07-26       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Modelling information exchange in worker-queen conflict over sex allocation.

Authors:  Ido Pen; Peter D Taylor
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 5.  Conflict resolution in insect societies.

Authors:  Francis L W Ratnieks; Kevin R Foster; Tom Wenseleers
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 19.686

6.  Patterns of split sex ratio in ants have multiple evolutionary causes based on different within-colony conflicts.

Authors:  Rolf Kümmerli; Laurent Keller
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  The effect of sex-allocation biasing on the evolution of worker policing in hymenopteran societies.

Authors:  K R Foster; F L Ratnieks
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Conditional Manipulation of Sex Ratios by Ant Workers: A Test of Kin Selection Theory

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Ant workers selfishly bias sex ratios by manipulating female development.

Authors:  R L Hammond; M W Bruford; A F G Bourke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Theory of genomic imprinting conflict in social insects.

Authors:  David C Queller
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2003-07-18       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sexual conflict and sex allocation.

Authors:  Tracey Chapman
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Sex-allocation conflict and sexual selection throughout the lifespan of eusocial colonies.

Authors:  Piret Avila; Lutz Fromhage; Laurent Lehmann
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Egg-laying "intermorphs" in the ant Crematogaster smithi neither affect sexual production nor male parentage.

Authors:  Jan Oettler; Michiel B Dijkstra; Jürgen Heinze
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.