Literature DB >> 11606841

Quantification of blood flow in the carotid arteries: comparison of Doppler ultrasound and three different phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging sequences.

J Seitz1, M Strotzer, T Wild, W R Nitz, M Völk, M Lenhart, S Feuerbach.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: To compare blood flow velocities in the carotid arteries measured with three different magnetic resonance (MR) phase-contrast imaging techniques and with percutaneous Doppler ultrasound.
METHODS: Fourteen healthy male volunteers with a mean age of 33 +/- 3.8 years were studied. Ultrasound and MR phase velocity mapping of both common carotid arteries (n = 28) was performed within 5 hours. A two-dimensional fast low-angle shot sequence with retrospective cardiac gating, a sequence with prospective cardiac triggering, and a breath-hold sequence with prospective cardiac triggering were used. Resistance indexes and pulsatility indexes were calculated for all modalities.
RESULTS: The comparison of flow velocities obtained with ultrasound and the different MR techniques led to a moderate correlation of the retrospective gated and prospective triggered MR techniques (eg, r = 0.73 for maximum systolic velocity). The worst correlation was found between the breath-hold technique and retrospective cardiac gating (eg, r = 0.004 for pulsatility index). There was a weak correlation of all three MR sequences compared with ultrasound (r = 0.19-0.60)
CONCLUSIONS: A moderate correlation was found between velocities and indexes measured with the prospective cardiac-triggered phase-contrast MR technique and the retrospective cardiac-gated phase-contrast MR technique. A weak correlation was found between the three different MR techniques and ultrasound, as well as between the breath-hold prospective cardiac-triggered MR sequence and both of the other MR sequences. The influence of temporal and spatial resolution on MR phase-contrast velocity mapping was confirmed.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11606841     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-200111000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  9 in total

1.  Fetal dynamic phase-contrast MR angiography using ultrasound gating and comparison with Doppler ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  B P Schoennagel; J Yamamura; F Kording; R Fischer; P Bannas; G Adam; H Kooijman; C Ruprecht; K Fehrs; M Tavares de Sousa
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparison of blood velocity measurements between ultrasound Doppler and accelerated phase-contrast MR angiography in small arteries with disturbed flow.

Authors:  Jingfeng Jiang; Charles Strother; Kevin Johnson; Sara Baker; Dan Consigny; Oliver Wieben; James Zagzebski
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Redistribution of cerebropetal blood flow in patients with carotid artery stenosis measured non-invasively with fast cine phase contrast MR angiography.

Authors:  Mirco Cosottini; Alessandro Pingitore; Maria Chiara Michelassi; Michele Puglioli; Guido Lazzarotti; Michele Caniglia; Giuliano Parenti; Carlo Bartolozzi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-10-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Velocity measurements in the middle cerebral arteries of healthy volunteers using 3D radial phase-contrast HYPRFlow: comparison with transcranial Doppler sonography and 2D phase-contrast MR imaging.

Authors:  W Chang; B Landgraf; K M Johnson; S Kecskemeti; Y Wu; J Velikina; H Rowley; O Wieben; C Mistretta; P Turski
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  The role of cardiac magnetic resonance in valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Juan C Lopez-Mattei; Dipan J Shah
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep

6.  In vitro validation of endovascular Doppler-derived flow rates in models of the cerebral circulation.

Authors:  P M McGah; J D Nerva; R P Morton; M C Barbour; M R Levitt; P D Mourad; L J Kim; A Aliseda
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.833

7.  Accuracy of computational cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics using patient-specific endovascular measurements.

Authors:  Patrick M McGah; Michael R Levitt; Michael C Barbour; Ryan P Morton; John D Nerva; Pierre D Mourad; Basavaraj V Ghodke; Danial K Hallam; Laligam N Sekhar; Louis J Kim; Alberto Aliseda
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Comparison of phase-contrast MR imaging and endovascular sonography for intracranial blood flow velocity measurements.

Authors:  J J Schneiders; S P Ferns; P van Ooij; M Siebes; A J Nederveen; R van den Berg; J van Lieshout; G Jansen; E vanBavel; C B Majoie
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Intracranial Flow Velocity Quantification Using Non-Contrast Four-Dimensional Flow MRI: A Prospective Comparative Study with Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound.

Authors:  Sam-Yeol Ha; Yeonah Kang; Ho-Joon Lee; Moonjung Hwang; Jiyeon Baik; Seongho Park
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-23
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.