Literature DB >> 11606646

A topographic instructive signal guides the adjustment of the auditory space map in the optic tectum.

P S Hyde1, E I Knudsen.   

Abstract

Maps of auditory space in the midbrain of the barn owl (Tyto alba) are calibrated by visual experience. When owls are raised wearing prismatic spectacles that displace the visual field in azimuth, the auditory receptive fields of neurons in the optic tectum shift to compensate for the optical displacement of the visual field. This shift results primarily from a shift in the tuning of tectal neurons for interaural time difference. The visually based instructive signal that guides this plasticity could be based on a topographic, point-by-point comparison between auditory and visual space maps or on a foveation-dependent visual assessment of the accuracy of auditory orienting responses. To distinguish between these two possibilities, we subjected owls to optical conditions that differed in the center of gaze and the visual periphery. A topographic signal would cause the portions of the space map representing the central and peripheral regions of visual space to adjust differently, according to the optical conditions that exist in each region. In contrast, a foveation-based signal would cause both portions of the map to adjust similarly, according to the optical conditions that exist at the center of gaze. In six of seven experiments, adaptive changes were as predicted by a topographic instructive signal. Although the results do not rule out the possible contribution of a foveation-based signal, they demonstrate that a topographic instructive signal is, indeed, involved in the calibration of the auditory space map in the barn owl optic tectum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11606646      PMCID: PMC6762791     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  19 in total

1.  A candidate pathway for a visual instructional signal to the barn owl's auditory system.

Authors:  H Luksch; B Gauger; H Wagner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Abnormal auditory experience induces frequency-specific adjustments in unit tuning for binaural localization cues in the optic tectum of juvenile owls.

Authors:  J I Gold; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Adaptive axonal remodeling in the midbrain auditory space map.

Authors:  W M DeBello; D E Feldman; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Stretched and upside-down maps of auditory space in the optic tectum of blind-reared owls; acoustic basis and behavioral correlates.

Authors:  E I Knudsen; S D Esterly; S du Lac
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Visual instruction of the neural map of auditory space in the developing optic tectum.

Authors:  E I Knudsen; M S Brainard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-07-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Neural maps of head movement vector and speed in the optic tectum of the barn owl.

Authors:  S du Lac; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Sensitive periods for visual calibration of the auditory space map in the barn owl optic tectum.

Authors:  M S Brainard; E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Registration of neural maps through value-dependent learning: modeling the alignment of auditory and visual maps in the barn owl's optic tectum.

Authors:  M Rucci; G Tononi; G M Edelman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Auditory and visual maps of space in the optic tectum of the owl.

Authors:  E I Knudsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Neural maps of interaural time and intensity differences in the optic tectum of the barn owl.

Authors:  J F Olsen; E I Knudsen; S D Esterly
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  7 in total

1.  Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music.

Authors:  Gabriella Musacchia; Mikko Sams; Erika Skoe; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A Hebbian learning rule mediates asymmetric plasticity in aligning sensory representations.

Authors:  Ilana B Witten; Eric I Knudsen; Haim Sompolinsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Experience-Dependent Reorganization Drives Development of a Binocularly Unified Cortical Representation of Orientation.

Authors:  Jeremy T Chang; David Whitney; David Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  3-D localization of virtual sound sources: effects of visual environment, pointing method, and training.

Authors:  Piotr Majdak; Matthew J Goupell; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Bidirectional regulation of the cAMP response element binding protein encodes spatial map alignment in prism-adapting barn owls.

Authors:  Grant S Nichols; William M DeBello
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Coding space-time stimulus dynamics in auditory brain maps.

Authors:  Yunyan Wang; Yoram Gutfreund; José L Peña
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  The representation of sound localization cues in the barn owl's inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Yoram Gutfreund; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.492

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.