Literature DB >> 11605107

A new robotic endoscope manipulator. A preliminary trial to evaluate the performance of a voice-operated industrial robot and a human assistant in several simulated and real endoscopic operations.

C Vara-Thorbeck1, V F Muñoz, R Toscano, J Gomez, J Fernández, M Felices, A Garcia-Cerezo.   

Abstract

We report our learning experience in simulated and real surgical tasks with a new voice-controlled robotic endoscope manipulator: an industrial robot with the tool-holder arm modified to support the optic and camera. The manipulator control-card programs have been rewritten to meet the needs of endoscopic surgeons. For this preliminary work, systems engineers with an additional monitor monitored, recorded, and compared the percentage effectiveness and precision of the responses of the robotic and human assistant to successive oral commands during the several different experimental surgical tasks. Simultaneously, to help develop this voice-commanded system for future, more precise robotic manipulation of surgical instruments, they measured the cartesian and spherical coordinates of successive positions of the optic. In unexpectedly difficult experimental conditions, the tireless robot proved more precise and effective than the demonstrably fatigable human: the steadier screen images of the robotic manipulations helped the surgeon tie knots in 7-0 sutures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11605107     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-001-0033-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  4 in total

1.  [Voice-controlled robot: a new surgical aide? Thoughts of a user].

Authors:  H Johanet
Journal:  Ann Chir       Date:  1998

2.  Synergistic benefits of combined technologies in complex, minimally invasive surgical procedures. Clinical experience and educational processes.

Authors:  W P Geis; H C Kim; P C McAfee; J G Kang; E J Brennan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery. From concept to development.

Authors:  J M Sackier; Y Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control .

Authors:  L R Kavoussi; R G Moore; J B Adams; A W Partin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 7.450

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  [Use of a mechatronic robotic camera holding system in head and neck surgery].

Authors:  J Kristin; R Geiger; F B Knapp; J Schipper; T Klenzner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  A novel device designed to improve the operability of energy devices with foot pedals in endoscopic surgery: the Foot-Site Monitor.

Authors:  Akihiro Kondo; Yuji Nishizawa; Yasumasa Horikiri; Hiroki Amemori; Yuichiro Tsukada; Takeshi Sasaki; Toshikazu Kawai; Hiroyuki Daiko; Masaaki Ito
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Concurrent use of a robotic uterine manipulator and a robotic laparoscope holder to achieve assistant-less solo laparoscopy: the double ViKY.

Authors:  Manish Maheshwari; Thomas Ind
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2015-06-30

4.  Innovation in robotic surgery: the Indian scenario.

Authors:  Suresh V Deshpande
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.