BACKGROUND: Primary care is expected to play a significant role in the management of patients with genetic problems. Currently, this particularly involves patients with a family history of cancer. If GPs are to exercise their gatekeeper role efficiently in this area, they must be able to evaluate genetic risk and make appropriate referral decisions. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine GPs' ability to assess risk and to make appropriate referral decisions for women with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer, and to determine their expectations of a referral to secondary care. METHOD: A questionnaire survey was carried out of the 282 GP principals working within Bedfordshire Health Authority. GPs were asked to make decisions for six simulated cases of women presenting with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. RESULTS: A total of 164 (58%) GPs returned completed questionnaires. Across the six family histories, the percentage of GPs making an appropriate risk assessment ranged from 21% [95% confidence interval (CI) 14-27%] to 63% (95% CI 56-71%), and an appropriate referral decision ranged from 40% (95% CI 32-48%) to 80% (95% CI 73-86%). Regardless of their accuracy of risk assessment, most GPs were consistent in deciding not to refer low risk women and to refer moderate and high risk women (range 71-85% of GPs for the six family histories). Only 43 (26%, 95% CI 20-33%) of GPs knew the three most important criteria for risk assessment. CONCLUSIONS: GPs require more help and education to enable them to perform their gatekeeper role satisfactorily when assessing patients with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer.
BACKGROUND: Primary care is expected to play a significant role in the management of patients with genetic problems. Currently, this particularly involves patients with a family history of cancer. If GPs are to exercise their gatekeeper role efficiently in this area, they must be able to evaluate genetic risk and make appropriate referral decisions. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine GPs' ability to assess risk and to make appropriate referral decisions for women with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer, and to determine their expectations of a referral to secondary care. METHOD: A questionnaire survey was carried out of the 282 GP principals working within Bedfordshire Health Authority. GPs were asked to make decisions for six simulated cases of women presenting with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. RESULTS: A total of 164 (58%) GPs returned completed questionnaires. Across the six family histories, the percentage of GPs making an appropriate risk assessment ranged from 21% [95% confidence interval (CI) 14-27%] to 63% (95% CI 56-71%), and an appropriate referral decision ranged from 40% (95% CI 32-48%) to 80% (95% CI 73-86%). Regardless of their accuracy of risk assessment, most GPs were consistent in deciding not to refer low risk women and to refer moderate and high risk women (range 71-85% of GPs for the six family histories). Only 43 (26%, 95% CI 20-33%) of GPs knew the three most important criteria for risk assessment. CONCLUSIONS: GPs require more help and education to enable them to perform their gatekeeper role satisfactorily when assessing patients with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer.
Authors: Peter W Rose; Michael Murphy; Marcus Munafo; Cyril Chapman; Neil Mortensen; Anneke Lucassen Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Sean M Blaine; June C Carroll; Andrea L Rideout; Gord Glendon; Wendy Meschino; Cheryl Shuman; Deanna Telner; Natasha Van Iderstine; Joanne Permaul Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2008-01-30 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Marta M Reis; Dorothy Young; Lorna McLeish; David Goudie; Alan Cook; Frank Sullivan; Helen Vysny; Alison Fordyce; Roger Black; Manouche Tavakoli; Michael Steel Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2006-07-01 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Susan A Sabatino; Risa B Burns; Roger B Davis; Russell S Phillips; Ellen P McCarthy Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Brian S Flynn; Marie E Wood; Takamaru Ashikaga; Alan Stockdale; Greg S Dana; Shelly Naud Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2010-06-03 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Laura-Mae Baldwin; Katrina F Trivers; C Holly A Andrilla; Barbara Matthews; Jacqueline W Miller; Denise M Lishner; Barbara A Goff Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 5.128