Literature DB >> 11602532

Coronary angiography cannot be used to assess myocardial perfusion in patients undergoing reperfusion for acute myocardial infarction.

S Kaul.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11602532      PMCID: PMC1729959          DOI: 10.1136/heart.86.5.483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Usefulness of quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography for prediction of ventricular function recovery after myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty.

Authors:  E Pérez-David; M A García-Fernández; J Quiles; P Mahía; J L López-Sendón; E López de Sa; M J Ledesma; M Moreno; M Desco; E García
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  The relation between myocardial blush grade and myocardial contrast echocardiography: which one is a better predictor of myocardial damage?

Authors:  S Rasoul; J-H E Dambrink; A Breeman; A Elvan; A W J van 't Hof
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  Improved prognosis of patients presenting with clinical markers of spontaneous reperfusion during acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  D Rimar; E Crystal; A Battler; S Gottlieb; D Freimark; H Hod; V Boyko; L Mandelzweig; S Behar; J Leor
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Imaging the myocardial microcirculation post-myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Steven K White; Derek J Hausenloy; James C Moon
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2012-12

5.  Myocardial contrast echocardiography is superior to other known modalities for assessing myocardial reperfusion after acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  K Greaves; S R Dixon; M Fejka; W W O'Neill; S R Redwood; M S Marber; R Senior
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.994

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.