OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical features, management, and prognosis of patients presenting with clinical markers of spontaneous reperfusion (SR) during acute myocardial infarction (AMI). DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: National registry of 26 coronary care units. PATIENTS: 2382 consecutive patients with AMI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient characteristics, management, and mortality. RESULTS: The incidence of SR was 4% of patients (n = 98) compared with thrombolytic treatment (n = 1163, 49%), primary angioplasty (n = 102, 4%), and non-reperfusion (n = 1019, 43%). SR patients were more likely to develop less or no myocardial damage as indicated by a higher percentage of non-Q wave AMI (58% v 32%, 47%, and 44%, respectively, p < 0.0001), aborted AMI (25% v 9%, 8%, and 12%, p < 0.001), and lower peak creatine kinase (503 v 1384, 1519, and 751 IU, p < 0.0001). SR patients, however, were more likely to develop recurrent ischaemic events (35% v 17%, 12%, and 16%, respectively; p < 0.001) and subsequently were more likely to be referred to coronary angiography (67%), angioplasty (41%), or bypass surgery (16%, p < 0.001). Mortality at 30 days (1% v 8%, 7%, and 13%, respectively, p < 0.0001) and one year (6% v 11%, 12%, and 19%, p < 0.0001) was significantly lower for SR patients than for the other subgroups. By multivariate analysis, SR remained a strong determinant of 30 day survival (odds ratio (OR) 0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 0.74). At one year, the association between SR and survival decreased (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.13). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical markers of SR are associated with greater myocardial salvage and favourable prognosis. The vulnerability of SR patients to recurrent ischaemic events suggests that they need close surveillance and may benefit from early intervention.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical features, management, and prognosis of patients presenting with clinical markers of spontaneous reperfusion (SR) during acute myocardial infarction (AMI). DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: National registry of 26 coronary care units. PATIENTS: 2382 consecutive patients with AMI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient characteristics, management, and mortality. RESULTS: The incidence of SR was 4% of patients (n = 98) compared with thrombolytic treatment (n = 1163, 49%), primary angioplasty (n = 102, 4%), and non-reperfusion (n = 1019, 43%). SRpatients were more likely to develop less or no myocardial damage as indicated by a higher percentage of non-Q wave AMI (58% v 32%, 47%, and 44%, respectively, p < 0.0001), aborted AMI (25% v 9%, 8%, and 12%, p < 0.001), and lower peak creatine kinase (503 v 1384, 1519, and 751 IU, p < 0.0001). SRpatients, however, were more likely to develop recurrent ischaemic events (35% v 17%, 12%, and 16%, respectively; p < 0.001) and subsequently were more likely to be referred to coronary angiography (67%), angioplasty (41%), or bypass surgery (16%, p < 0.001). Mortality at 30 days (1% v 8%, 7%, and 13%, respectively, p < 0.0001) and one year (6% v 11%, 12%, and 19%, p < 0.0001) was significantly lower for SRpatients than for the other subgroups. By multivariate analysis, SR remained a strong determinant of 30 day survival (odds ratio (OR) 0.16, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 0.74). At one year, the association between SR and survival decreased (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.18 to 1.13). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical markers of SR are associated with greater myocardial salvage and favourable prognosis. The vulnerability of SRpatients to recurrent ischaemic events suggests that they need close surveillance and may benefit from early intervention.
Authors: B L Huey; M Gheorghiade; R S Crampton; G A Beller; D L Kaiser; D D Watson; T W Nygaard; G B Craddock; S L Sayre; R S Gibson Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1987-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: S Matetzky; D Freimark; P Chouraqui; I Novikov; O Agranat; B Rabinowitz; E Kaplinsky; H Hod Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 24.094