Literature DB >> 11601470

Determination of fat in raw and processed milks by the Gerber method: collaborative study.

D H Kleyn1, J M Lynch, D M Barbano, M J Bloom, M W Mitchell.   

Abstract

The Gerber method is used worldwide as a simple and rapid method for determining fat in raw and processed milks. However, the volume of the test portion used in the method has not been internationally agreed upon. A collaborative study was conducted to evaluate performance of the Gerber method using either a weighed test portion (11.13 g) or by a 10.77 mL test portion delivered by pipet. For each method, laboratories received 10 test samples: 5 raw and 5 pasteurized homogenized milks, 2 of which were blind duplicate pairs. Eleven and 10 laboratories participated in the evaluation of aliquot addition by weight and pipet, respectively. Mojonnier ether extraction (Method 989.05) was used as the reference method. Interlaboratory study statistics were similar between methods of test portion addition and between raw and processed materials; therefore, summary interlaboratory study statistics were pooled. The fat content of milk samples ranged from 0.96 to 5.48%. Absolute reproducibility and repeatability were not affected by fat level, and pooled statistical performance (invalid and outlier data removed) was (g fat/100 g milk) s(r) = 0.026, s(R) = 0.047, r = 0.074, and R = 0.132. Relative standard deviations increased with decreasing fat content, and were summarized by fat level: 1-2% fat milk, mean = 1.437, RSD(r) = 1.809%, RSD(R) = 3.271%; 2-6% fat milk, mean = 4.156, RSD(r) = 0.626%, RSD(R) = 1.131%. Compared with ether extraction, test results by the Gerber method were slightly lower (0.02% fat) using a weighed test portion and significantly lower (0.06% fat) using a 10.77 mL volume addition by pipet. A trend toward underestimating fat content at lower fat concentrations (1-2% fat) was observed with the weighed test portion but not when a pipet was used. The Associate Referee recommends that the Gerber method using a weighed test portion be adopted as First Action with applicability limited to whole milk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11601470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AOAC Int        ISSN: 1060-3271            Impact factor:   1.913


  16 in total

1.  Soft plastic bag instead of hard plastic container for long-term storage of breast milk.

Authors:  Waricha Janjindamai; Anucha Thatrimontrichai; Gunlawadee Maneenil; Maneerat Puwanant
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Utilization of Mucuna pruriens whole pods to feed lactating hair ewes.

Authors:  Irina Nadieska Peniche-Gonzalez; Luis Armando Sarmiento-Franco; Ronald Herve Santos-Ricalde
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Comparison of mid-infrared transmission spectroscopy with biochemical methods for the determination of macronutrients in human milk.

Authors:  Dolores Silvestre; Miriam Fraga; María Gormaz; Ester Torres; Máximo Vento
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Comparative antioxidant potential of kefir and yogurt of bovine and non-bovine origins.

Authors:  Mehdi Baniasadi; Maryam Azizkhani; Per Erik Joakim Saris; Fahimeh Tooryan
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.701

5.  Evaluation and Comparison of the Nutritional and Mineral Content of Milk Formula in the Saudi Arabia Market.

Authors:  Nora A Alfaris; Zeid A Alothman; Tahany S Aldayel; Saikh M Wabaidur; Jozaa Z Altamimi
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-06-09

6.  Soy milk consumption, inflammation, coagulation, and oxidative stress among type 2 diabetic patients with nephropathy.

Authors:  Maryam Sadat Miraghajani; Ahmad Esmaillzadeh; Mojgan Mortazavi Najafabadi; Maryam Mirlohi; Leila Azadbakht
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Measuring milk fat content by random laser emission.

Authors:  Luis M G Abegão; Alessandra A C Pagani; Sérgio C Zílio; Márcio A R C Alencar; José J Rodrigues
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Microbiological, biochemical and organoleptic properties of fermented-probiotic drink produced from camel milk.

Authors:  Saideh Saljooghi; Ladan Mansouri-Najand; Hadi Ebrahimnejad; Farideh Doostan; Nasrin Askari
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 1.054

9.  Comparison of macronutrient content in human milk measured by mid-infrared human milk analyzer and reference methods.

Authors:  Francesca Giuffrida; Sean Austin; Denis Cuany; Belén Sanchez-Bridge; Karin Longet; Emmanuelle Bertschy; Julien Sauser; Sagar K Thakkar; Le Ye Lee; Michael Affolter
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 2.521

10.  Alteration of fatty acid profile of milk in Holstein cows fed Bacillus coagulans as probiotic: a field study.

Authors:  B Izadi; M Mohebbi-Fani; S Hosseinzadeh; S S Shekarforoush; S Nazifi; A Rasooli
Journal:  Iran J Vet Res       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 1.376

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.